Olfactory dysfunction: properties of the Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 test and associations with quality of life.


PURPOSE: The Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 test is a test of olfactory performance based on pen-like odor dispensing devices. The aims of this study were to analyze the performance of this test in a general population sample and to explore associations between olfactory dysfunction and quality of life. METHODS: A large community sample (n = 7267) completed the Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 test and several questionnaires measuring quality of life, anxiety, dispositional optimism, social support, and satisfaction with life. RESULTS: According to the criteria recommended by the test manufacturer, 5.1% of the participants were anosmic (score = 6), 52.4% were dysosmic (7 = score = 10), and 42.5% were normosmic (score >/= 11). While frequencies of correct identification differed between the 12 sticks, all sticks contributed positively to the test results. The associations between olfactory functioning and quality of life variables were negligible. In the multivariate analyses, none of the associations reached the 1% significance level. CONCLUSIONS: While studies with patients in otorhinolaryngological clinics often report substantial detriments to their quality of life in relation to olfactory dysfunction, the present epidemiological study cannot confirm this association for the general population.

PubMed ID: 30456541

Projects: LIFE Adult

Publication type: Not specified

Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Human Diseases: No Human Disease specified

Citation: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):389-395. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5210-2. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

Date Published: 21st Nov 2018

Registered Mode: by PubMed ID

Authors: A. Hinz, T. Luck, S. G. Riedel-Heller, P. Y. Herzberg, C. Rolffs, K. Wirkner, C. Engel

help Submitter

Views: 1399

Created: 4th Nov 2019 at 12:41

Last updated: 7th Dec 2021 at 17:58

help Tags

This item has not yet been tagged.

help Attributions


Related items

Powered by
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies