Publications

265 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 265

Abstract (Expand)

PURPOSE To estimate age-specific relative and absolute cancer risks of breast cancer and to estimate risks of ovarian, pancreatic, male breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers associated with germlinee PALB2 pathogenic variants (PVs) because these risks have not been extensively characterized. METHODS We analyzed data from 524 families with PALB2 PVs from 21 countries. Complex segregation analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs; relative to country-specific population incidences) and absolute risks of cancers. The models allowed for residual familial aggregation of breast and ovarian cancer and were adjusted for the family-specific ascertainment schemes. RESULTS We found associations between PALB2 PVs and risk of female breast cancer (RR, 7.18; 95% CI, 5.82 to 8.85; P = 6.5 \times 10-76), ovarian cancer (RR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.04; P = 4.1 \times 10-3), pancreatic cancer (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.50; P = 8.7 \times 10-3), and male breast cancer (RR, 7.34; 95% CI, 1.28 to 42.18; P = 2.6 \times 10-2). There was no evidence for increased risks of prostate or colorectal cancer. The breast cancer RRs declined with age (P for trend = 2.0 \times 10-3). After adjusting for family ascertainment, breast cancer risk estimates on the basis of multiple case families were similar to the estimates from families ascertained through population-based studies (P for difference = .41). On the basis of the combined data, the estimated risks to age 80 years were 53% (95% CI, 44% to 63%) for female breast cancer, 5% (95% CI, 2% to 10%) for ovarian cancer, 2%-3% (95% CI females, 1% to 4%; 95% CI males, 2% to 5%) for pancreatic cancer, and 1% (95% CI, 0.2% to 5%) for male breast cancer. CONCLUSION These results confirm PALB2 as a major breast cancer susceptibility gene and establish substantial associations between germline PALB2 PVs and ovarian, pancreatic, and male breast cancers. These findings will facilitate incorporation of PALB2 into risk prediction models and optimize the clinical cancer risk management of PALB2 PV carriers.

Authors: Xin Yang, Goska Leslie, Alicja Doroszuk, Sandra Schneider, Jamie Allen, Brennan Decker, Alison M. Dunning, James Redman, James Scarth, Inga Plaskocinska, Craig Luccarini, Mitul Shah, Karen Pooley, Leila Dorling, Andrew Lee, Muriel A. Adank, Julian Adlard, Kristiina Aittomäki, Irene L. Andrulis, Peter Ang, Julian Barwell, Jonine L. Bernstein, Kristie Bobolis, Åke Borg, Carl Blomqvist, Kathleen B. M. Claes, Patrick Concannon, Adeline Cuggia, Julie O. Culver, Francesca Damiola, Antoine de Pauw, Orland Diez, Jill S. Dolinsky, Susan M. Domchek, Christoph Engel, D. Gareth Evans, Florentia Fostira, Judy Garber, Lisa Golmard, Ellen L. Goode, Stephen B. Gruber, Eric Hahnen, Christopher Hake, Tuomas Heikkinen, Judith E. Hurley, Ramunas Janavicius, Zdenek Kleibl, Petra Kleiblova, Irene Konstantopoulou, Anders Kvist, Holly Laduca, Ann S. G. Lee, Fabienne Lesueur, Eamonn R. Maher, Arto Mannermaa, Siranoush Manoukian, Rachel McFarland, Wendy McKinnon, Alfons Meindl, Kelly Metcalfe, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib, Jukka Moilanen, Katherine L. Nathanson, Susan Neuhausen, Pei Sze Ng, Tu Nguyen-Dumont, Sarah M. Nielsen, Florian Obermair, Kenneth Offit, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Laura Ottini, Judith Penkert, Katri Pylkäs, Paolo Radice, Susan J. Ramus, Vilius Rudaitis, Lucy Side, Rachel Silva-Smith, Valentina Silvestri, Anne-Bine Skytte, Thomas Slavin, Jana Soukupova, Carlo Tondini, Alison H. Trainer, Gary Unzeitig, Lydia Usha, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, James Whitworth, Marie Wood, Cheng Har Yip, Sook-Yee Yoon, Amal Yussuf, George Zogopoulos, David Goldgar, John L. Hopper, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Paul Pharoah, Sophia H. L. George, Judith Balmaña, Claude Houdayer, Paul James, Zaki El-Haffaf, Hans Ehrencrona, Marketa Janatova, Paolo Peterlongo, Heli Nevanlinna, Rita Schmutzler, Soo-Hwang Teo, Mark Robson, Tuya Pal, Fergus Couch, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Aaron Elliott, Melissa Southey, Robert Winqvist, Douglas F. Easton, William D. Foulkes, Antonis C. Antoniou, Marc Tischkowitz

Date Published: 1st Mar 2020

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carrierss of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. METHODS Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. RESULTS The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. CONCLUSION There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. IMPACT Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies.

Authors: Paolo Peterlongo, Jenny Chang-Claude, Kirsten B. Moysich, Anja Rudolph, Rita K. Schmutzler, Jacques Simard, Penny Soucy, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Ute Hamann, Stefan Wilkening, Bowang Chen, Matti A. Rookus, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Frederieke H. van der Baan, Amanda B. Spurdle, Logan C. Walker, Felicity Lose, Ana-Teresa Maia, Marco Montagna, Laura Matricardi, Jan Lubinski, Anna Jakubowska, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Robert L. Nussbaum, Katherine L. Nathanson, Susan M. Domchek, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Banu K. Arun, Beth Y. Karlan, Sandra Orsulic, Jenny Lester, Wendy K. Chung, Alex Miron, Melissa C. Southey, David E. Goldgar, Saundra S. Buys, Ramunas Janavicius, Cecilia M. Dorfling, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Yuan Chun Ding, Susan L. Neuhausen, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Bent Ejlertsen, Lars Jønson, Ana Osorio, Cristina Martínez-Bouzas, Javier Benitez, Edye E. Conway, Kathleen R. Blazer, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Giulietta Scuvera, Monica Barile, Filomena Ficarazzi, Frederique Mariette, Stefano Fortuzzi, Alessandra Viel, Giuseppe Giannini, Laura Papi, Aline Martayan, Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Paolo Radice, Athanassios Vratimos, Florentia Fostira, Judy E. Garber, Alan Donaldson, Carole Brewer, Claire Foo, D. Gareth R. Evans, Debra Frost, Diana Eccles, Angela Brady, Jackie Cook, Marc Tischkowitz, Julian Adlard, Julian Barwell, Lisa Walker, Louise Izatt, Lucy E. Side, M. John Kennedy, Mark T. Rogers, Mary E. Porteous, Patrick J. Morrison, Radka Platte, Rosemarie Davidson, Shirley V. Hodgson, Steve Ellis, Trevor Cole, Andrew K. Godwin, Kathleen Claes, Tom van Maerken, Alfons Meindl, Andrea Gehrig, Christian Sutter, Christoph Engel, Dieter Niederacher, Doris Steinemann, Hansjoerg Plendl, Karin Kast, Kerstin Rhiem, Nina Ditsch, Norbert Arnold, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Bruno Buecher, Capucine Delnatte, Claude Houdayer, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Francesca Damiola, Isabelle Coupier, Laure Barjhoux, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Lisa Golmard, Nadia Boutry-Kryza, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Olivier Caron, Pascal Pujol, Sylvie Mazoyer, Muriel Belotti, Marion Piedmonte, Michael L. Friedlander, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Larry J. Copeland, Miguel de La Hoya, Pedro Perez Segura, Heli Nevanlinna, Kristiina Aittomäki, Theo A. M. van Os, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Annemarie H. van der Hout, Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Helena C. van Doorn, J. Margriet Collée, Edith Olah, Orland Diez, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Joan Brunet, Lidia Feliubadalo, Cezary Cybulski, Jacek Gronwald, Katarzyna Durda, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Grzegorz Sukiennicki, Adalgeir Arason, Jocelyne Chiquette, Manuel R. Teixeira, Curtis Olswold, Fergus J. Couch, Noralane M. Lindor, Xianshu Wang, Csilla I. Szabo, Kenneth Offit, Marina Corines, Lauren Jacobs, Mark E. Robson, Liying Zhang, Vijai Joseph, Andreas Berger, Christian F. Singer, Christine Rappaport, Daphne Geschwantler Kaulich, Georg Pfeiler, Muy-Kheng M. Tea, Catherine M. Phelan, Mark H. Greene, Phuong L. Mai, Gad Rennert, Anna Marie Mulligan, Gord Glendon, Sandrine Tchatchou, Irene L. Andrulis, Amanda Ewart Toland, Anders Bojesen, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Mads Thomassen, Uffe Birk Jensen, Yael Laitman, Johanna Rantala, Anna von Wachenfeldt, Hans Ehrencrona, Marie Stenmark Askmalm, Åke Borg, Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker, Lesley McGuffog, Daniel Barrowdale, Sue Healey, Andrew Lee, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou, Eitan Friedman

Date Published: 13th Jan 2015

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

Importance The limited data on cancer phenotypes in men with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) have hampered the development of evidence-based recommendations for early cancer detectionn and risk reduction in this population. Objective To compare the cancer spectrum and frequencies between male BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study of 6902 men, including 3651 BRCA1 and 3251 BRCA2 PV carriers, older than 18 years recruited from cancer genetics clinics from 1966 to 2017 by 53 study groups in 33 countries worldwide collaborating through the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Clinical data and pathologic characteristics were collected. Main Outcomes and Measures BRCA1/2 status was the outcome in a logistic regression, and cancer diagnoses were the independent predictors. All odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age, country of origin, and calendar year of the first interview. Results Among the 6902 men in the study (median [range] age, 51.6 [18-100] years), 1634 cancers were diagnosed in 1376 men (19.9%), the majority (922 of 1,376 [67%]) being BRCA2 PV carriers. Being affected by any cancer was associated with a higher probability of being a BRCA2, rather than a BRCA1, PV carrier (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.81-3.70; P \textless .001), as well as developing 2 (OR, 7.97; 95% CI, 5.47-11.60; P \textless .001) and 3 (OR, 19.60; 95% CI, 4.64-82.89; P \textless .001) primary tumors. A higher frequency of breast (OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 4.06-7.37; P \textless .001) and prostate (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78; P = .008) cancers was associated with a higher probability of being a BRCA2 PV carrier. Among cancers other than breast and prostate, pancreatic cancer was associated with a higher probability (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.55-5.81; P = .001) and colorectal cancer with a lower probability (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29-0.78; P = .003) of being a BRCA2 PV carrier. Conclusions and Relevance Significant differences in the cancer spectrum were observed in male BRCA2, compared with BRCA1, PV carriers. These data may inform future recommendations for surveillance of BRCA1/2-associated cancers and guide future prospective studies for estimating cancer risks in men with BRCA1/2 PVs.

Authors: Valentina Silvestri, Goska Leslie, Daniel R. Barnes, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Kristiina Aittomäki, Elisa Alducci, Irene L. Andrulis, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Alicia Barroso, Daniel Barrowdale, Javier Benitez, Bernardo Bonanni, Ake Borg, Saundra S. Buys, Trinidad Caldés, Maria A. Caligo, Carlo Capalbo, Ian Campbell, Wendy K. Chung, Kathleen B. M. Claes, Sarah V. Colonna, Laura Cortesi, Fergus J. Couch, Miguel de La Hoya, Orland Diez, Yuan Chun Ding, Susan Domchek, Douglas F. Easton, Bent Ejlertsen, Christoph Engel, D. Gareth Evans, Lidia Feliubadalò, Lenka Foretova, Florentia Fostira, Lajos Géczi, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Gord Glendon, Andrew K. Godwin, David E. Goldgar, Eric Hahnen, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, John L. Hopper, Peter J. Hulick, Claudine Isaacs, Angel Izquierdo, Paul A. James, Ramunas Janavicius, Uffe Birk Jensen, Esther M. John, Vijai Joseph, Irene Konstantopoulou, Allison W. Kurian, Ava Kwong, Elisabetta Landucci, Fabienne Lesueur, Jennifer T. Loud, Eva Machackova, Phuong L. Mai, Keivan Majidzadeh-A, Siranoush Manoukian, Marco Montagna, Lidia Moserle, Anna Marie Mulligan, Katherine L. Nathanson, Heli Nevanlinna, Joanne Ngeow Yuen Ye, Liene Nikitina-Zake, Kenneth Offit, Edith Olah, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Ana Osorio, Laura Papi, Sue K. Park, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Pedro Perez-Segura, Annabeth H. Petersen, Pedro Pinto, Berardino Porfirio, Miquel Angel Pujana, Paolo Radice, Johanna Rantala, Muhammad U. Rashid, Barak Rosenzweig, Maria Rossing, Marta Santamariña, Rita K. Schmutzler, Leigha Senter, Jacques Simard, Christian F. Singer, Angela R. Solano, Melissa C. Southey, Linda Steele, Zoe Steinsnyder, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Yen Yen Tan, Manuel R. Teixeira, Soo H. Teo, Mary Beth Terry, Mads Thomassen, Amanda E. Toland, Sara Torres-Esquius, Nadine Tung, Christi J. van Asperen, Ana Vega, Alessandra Viel, Jeroen Vierstraete, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Greet Wieme, Sook-Yee Yoon, Kristin K. Zorn, Lesley McGuffog, Michael T. Parsons, Ute Hamann, Mark H. Greene, Judy A. Kirk, Susan L. Neuhausen, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Marc Tischkowitz, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou, Eitan Friedman, Laura Ottini

Date Published: 2nd Jul 2020

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 6q25.1, near the ESR1 gene, have been implicated in the susceptibility to breast cancer for Asian (rs2046210) and European women (rs9397435). A genome-wide association study in Europeans identified two further breast cancer susceptibility variants: rs11249433 at 1p11.2 and rs999737 in RAD51L1 at 14q24.1. Although previously identified breast cancer susceptibility variants have been shown to be associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, the involvement of these SNPs to breast cancer susceptibility in mutation carriers is currently unknown. To address this, we genotyped these SNPs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers from 42 studies from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2. In the analysis of 14 123 BRCA1 and 8053 BRCA2 mutation carriers of European ancestry, the 6q25.1 SNPs (r(2) = 0.14) were independently associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 mutation carriers [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.23, P-trend = 4.5 \times 10(-9) for rs2046210; HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18-1.40, P-trend = 1.3 \times 10(-8) for rs9397435], but only rs9397435 was associated with the risk for BRCA2 carriers (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.28, P-trend = 0.031). SNP rs11249433 (1p11.2) was associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17, P-trend = 0.015), but was not associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.02, P-trend = 0.20). SNP rs999737 (RAD51L1) was not associated with breast cancer risk for either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (P-trend = 0.27 and 0.30, respectively). The identification of SNPs at 6q25.1 associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers will lead to a better understanding of the biology of tumour development in these women.

Authors: Antonis C. Antoniou, Christiana Kartsonaki, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Penny Soucy, Lesley McGuffog, Sue Healey, Andrew Lee, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Elisa Cattaneo, Monica Barile, Valeria Pensotti, Barbara Pasini, Riccardo Dolcetti, Giuseppe Giannini, Anna Laura Putignano, Liliana Varesco, Paolo Radice, Phuong L. Mai, Mark H. Greene, Irene L. Andrulis, Gord Glendon, Hilmi Ozcelik, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Torben A. Kruse, Uffe Birk Jensen, Dorthe G. Crüger, Maria A. Caligo, Yael Laitman, Roni Milgrom, Bella Kaufman, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Eitan Friedman, Niklas Loman, Katja Harbst, Annika Lindblom, Brita Arver, Hans Ehrencrona, Beatrice Melin, Katherine L. Nathanson, Susan M. Domchek, Timothy Rebbeck, Ania Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Jacek Gronwald, Tomasz Huzarski, Tomasz Byrski, Cezary Cybulski, Bohdan Gorski, Ana Osorio, Teresa Ramón y Cajal, Florentia Fostira, Raquel Andrés, Javier Benitez, Ute Hamann, Frans B. Hogervorst, Matti A. Rookus, Maartje J. Hooning, Marcel R. Nelen, Rob B. van der Luijt, Theo A. M. van Os, Christi J. van Asperen, Peter Devilee, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Susan Peock, Margaret Cook, Debra Frost, Radka Platte, Jean Leyland, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Ros Eeles, Louise Izatt, Julian Adlard, Rosemarie Davidson, Diana Eccles, Kai-Ren Ong, Jackie Cook, Fiona Douglas, Joan Paterson, M. John Kennedy, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, Andrew Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Bruno Buecher, Muriel Belotti, Carole Tirapo, Sylvie Mazoyer, Laure Barjhoux, Christine Lasset, Dominique Leroux, Laurence Faivre, Myriam Bronner, Fabienne Prieur, Catherine Nogues, Etienne Rouleau, Pascal Pujol, Isabelle Coupier, Marc Frénay, John L. Hopper, Mary B. Daly, Mary B. Terry, Esther M. John, Saundra S. Buys, Yosuf Yassin, Alexander Miron, David Goldgar, Christian F. Singer, Muy-Kheng Tea, Georg Pfeiler, Anne Catharina Dressler, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Lars Jønson, Bent Ejlertsen, Rosa Bjork Barkardottir, Tomas Kirchhoff, Kenneth Offit, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo Rodriguez, Laurie Small, John Boggess, Stephanie Blank, Jack Basil, Masoud Azodi, Amanda Ewart Toland, Marco Montagna, Silvia Tognazzo, Simona Agata, Evgeny Imyanitov, Ramunas Janavicius, Conxi Lazaro, Ignacio Blanco, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Lara Sucheston, Beth Y. Karlan, Christine S. Walsh, Edith Olah, Aniko Bozsik, Soo-Hwang Teo, Joyce L. Seldon, Mary S. Beattie, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Michelle D. Sluiter, Orland Diez, Rita K. Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Ina Ruehl, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Karin Kast, Helmut Deissler, Dieter Niederacher, Norbert Arnold, Dorothea Gadzicki, Ines Schönbuchner, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de La Hoya, Heli Nevanlinna, Kristiina Aittomäki, Martine Dumont, Jocelyne Chiquette, Marc Tischkowitz, Xiaoqing Chen, Jonathan Beesley, Amanda B. Spurdle, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan Chun Ding, Zachary Fredericksen, Xianshu Wang, Vernon S. Pankratz, Fergus Couch, Jacques Simard, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench

Date Published: 15th Aug 2011

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast cancer. However, evidence suggests that these risks are modified by other genetic or environmental factors that cluster in families. A recent genome-wide association study has shown that common alleles at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 (rs2981582), TNRC9 (rs3803662), and MAP3K1 (rs889312) are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. To investigate whether these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in a sample of 10,358 mutation carriers from 23 studies. The minor alleles of SNP rs2981582 and rs889312 were each associated with increased breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20-1.45, p(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-8) and HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24, p(trend) = 0.02) but not in BRCA1 carriers. rs3803662 was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, p(trend) = 5 x 10(-5) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined). These loci appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. The differences in the effects of the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 SNPs between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers point to differences in the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer tumors and confirm the distinct nature of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors: Antonis C. Antoniou, Amanda B. Spurdle, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Sue Healey, Karen A. Pooley, Rita K. Schmutzler, Beatrix Versmold, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Norbert Arnold, Wera Hofmann, Christian Sutter, Dieter Niederacher, Helmut Deissler, Trinidad Caldes, Kati Kämpjärvi, Heli Nevanlinna, Jacques Simard, Jonathan Beesley, Xiaoqing Chen, Susan L. Neuhausen, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Theresa Wagner, Henry T. Lynch, Claudine Isaacs, Jeffrey Weitzel, Patricia A. Ganz, Mary B. Daly, Gail Tomlinson, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Joanne L. Blum, Fergus J. Couch, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Monica Barile, Paolo Radice, Csilla I. Szabo, Lutecia H. Mateus Pereira, Mark H. Greene, Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Ofra Barnett-Griness, Irene L. Andrulis, Hilmi Ozcelik, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Maria A. Caligo, Yael Laitman, Bella Kaufman, Roni Milgrom, Eitan Friedman, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Ana Osorio, Gemma Llort, Roger L. Milne, Javier Benítez, Ute Hamann, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Peggy Manders, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Susan Peock, Margaret Cook, Radka Platte, D. Gareth Evans, Rosalind Eeles, Gabriella Pichert, Carol Chu, Diana Eccles, Rosemarie Davidson, Fiona Douglas, Andrew K. Godwin, Laure Barjhoux, Sylvie Mazoyer, Hagay Sobol, Violaine Bourdon, François Eisinger, Agnès Chompret, Corinne Capoulade, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Gilbert M. Lenoir, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Claude Houdayer, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton

Date Published: 1st Apr 2008

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

The known breast cancer susceptibility polymorphisms in FGFR2, TNRC9/TOX3, MAP3K1, LSP1, and 2q35 confer increased risks of breast cancer for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. We evaluated the associations of 3 additional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs4973768 in SLC4A7/NEK10, rs6504950 in STXBP4/COX11, and rs10941679 at 5p12, and reanalyzed the previous associations using additional carriers in a sample of 12,525 BRCA1 and 7,409 BRCA2 carriers. Additionally, we investigated potential interactions between SNPs and assessed the implications for risk prediction. The minor alleles of rs4973768 and rs10941679 were associated with increased breast cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers (per-allele HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.18, P = 0.006 and HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19, P = 0.03, respectively). Neither SNP was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 carriers, and rs6504950 was not associated with breast cancer for either BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers. Of the 9 polymorphisms investigated, 7 were associated with breast cancer for BRCA2 carriers (FGFR2, TOX3, MAP3K1, LSP1, 2q35, SLC4A7, 5p12, P = 7 \times 10(-11) - 0.03), but only TOX3 and 2q35 were associated with the risk for BRCA1 carriers (P = 0.0049, 0.03, respectively). All risk-associated polymorphisms appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk for mutation carriers. Based on the joint genotype distribution of the 7 risk-associated SNPs in BRCA2 mutation carriers, the 5% of BRCA2 carriers at highest risk (i.e., between 95th and 100th percentiles) were predicted to have a probability between 80% and 96% of developing breast cancer by age 80, compared with 42% to 50% for the 5% of carriers at lowest risk. Our findings indicated that these risk differences might be sufficient to influence the clinical management of mutation carriers.

Authors: Antonis C. Antoniou, Jonathan Beesley, Lesley McGuffog, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Sue Healey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan Chun Ding, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Henry T. Lynch, Claudine Isaacs, Patricia A. Ganz, Gail Tomlinson, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Noralane M. Lindor, Vernon S. Pankratz, Paolo Radice, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Monica Barile, Alessandra Viel, Anna Allavena, Valentina Dall’Olio, Paolo Peterlongo, Csilla I. Szabo, Michal Zikan, Kathleen Claes, Bruce Poppe, Lenka Foretova, Phuong L. Mai, Mark H. Greene, Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Gord Glendon, Hilmi Ozcelik, Irene L. Andrulis, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Lone Sunde, Dorthe Cruger, Uffe Birk Jensen, Maria Caligo, Eitan Friedman, Bella Kaufman, Yael Laitman, Roni Milgrom, Maya Dubrovsky, Shimrit Cohen, Ake Borg, Helena Jernström, Annika Lindblom, Johanna Rantala, Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Beatrice Melin, Kate Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Ania Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Tomasz Huzarski, Ana Osorio, Adriana Lasa, Mercedes Durán, Maria-Isabel Tejada, Javier Godino, Javier Benitez, Ute Hamann, Mieke Kriege, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Rob B. van der Luijt, Christi J. van Asperen, Peter Devilee, E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Marinus J. Blok, Cora M. Aalfs, Frans Hogervorst, Matti Rookus, Margaret Cook, Clare Oliver, Debra Frost, Don Conroy, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Gabriella Pichert, Rosemarie Davidson, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Joan Paterson, Shirley Hodgson, Patrick J. Morrison, Mary E. Porteous, Lisa Walker, M. John Kennedy, Huw Dorkins, Susan Peock, Andrew K. Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Antoine de Pauw, Sylvie Mazoyer, Valérie Bonadona, Christine Lasset, Hélène Dreyfus, Dominique Leroux, Agnès Hardouin, Pascaline Berthet, Laurence Faivre, Catherine Loustalot, Tetsuro Noguchi, Hagay Sobol, Etienne Rouleau, Catherine Nogues, Marc Frénay, Laurence Vénat-Bouvet, John L. Hopper, Mary B. Daly, Mary B. Terry, Esther M. John, Saundra S. Buys, Yosuf Yassin, Alexander Miron, David Goldgar, Christian F. Singer, Anne Catharina Dressler, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Georg Pfeiler, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Lars Jønson, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Tomas Kirchhoff, Kenneth Offit, Vincent Devlin, Ana Dutra-Clarke, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Katie Wakeley, John F. Boggess, Jack Basil, Peter E. Schwartz, Stephanie V. Blank, Amanda Ewart Toland, Marco Montagna, Cinzia Casella, Evgeny Imyanitov, Laima Tihomirova, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Susan J. Ramus, Lara Sucheston, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Gross, Rita Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Magdalena Lochmann, Norbert Arnold, Simone Heidemann, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Helmut Deissler, Dorothea Gadzicki, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Karin Kast, Ines Schönbuchner, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de La Hoya, Kristiina Aittomäki, Heli Nevanlinna, Jacques Simard, Amanda B. Spurdle, Helene Holland, Xiaoqing Chen, Radka Platte, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton

Date Published: 6th Dec 2010

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

INTRODUCTION Previous studies have demonstrated that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles are differentially associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers. It iss currently unknown how these alleles are associated with different breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers defined by estrogen (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status of the tumour. METHODS We used genotype data on up to 11,421 BRCA1 and 7,080 BRCA2 carriers, of whom 4,310 had been affected with breast cancer and had information on either ER or PR status of the tumour, to assess the associations of 12 loci with breast cancer tumour characteristics. Associations were evaluated using a retrospective cohort approach. RESULTS The results suggested stronger associations with ER-positive breast cancer than ER-negative for 11 loci in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Among BRCA1 carriers, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2981582 (FGFR2) exhibited the biggest difference based on ER status (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) for ER-positive = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.56 vs HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98 for ER-negative, P-heterogeneity = 6.5 \times 10-6). In contrast, SNP rs2046210 at 6q25.1 near ESR1 was primarily associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. In BRCA2 carriers, SNPs in FGFR2, TOX3, LSP1, SLC4A7/NEK10, 5p12, 2q35, and 1p11.2 were significantly associated with ER-positive but not ER-negative disease. Similar results were observed when differentiating breast cancer cases by PR status. CONCLUSIONS The associations of the 12 SNPs with risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers differ by ER-positive or ER-negative breast cancer status. The apparent differences in SNP associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers, may be explicable by differences in the prevalence of tumour subtypes. As more risk modifying variants are identified, incorporating these associations into breast cancer subtype-specific risk models may improve clinical management for mutation carriers.

Authors: Anna Marie Mulligan, Fergus J. Couch, Daniel Barrowdale, Susan M. Domchek, Diana Eccles, Heli Nevanlinna, Susan J. Ramus, Mark Robson, Mark Sherman, Amanda B. Spurdle, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Andrew Lee, Lesley McGuffog, Sue Healey, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Ramunas Janavicius, Thomas vO Hansen, Finn C. Nielsen, Bent Ejlertsen, Ana Osorio, Iván Muñoz-Repeto, Mercedes Durán, Javier Godino, Maroulio Pertesi, Javier Benítez, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Elisa Cattaneo, Bernardo Bonanni, Alessandra Viel, Barbara Pasini, Laura Papi, Laura Ottini, Antonella Savarese, Loris Bernard, Paolo Radice, Ute Hamann, Martijn Verheus, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Juul Wijnen, Encarna B. Gómez García, Marcel R. Nelen, C. Marleen Kets, Caroline Seynaeve, Madeleine M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst, Rob B. van der Luijt, Theo van Os, Matti Rookus, Debra Frost, J. Louise Jones, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Ros Eeles, Louise Izatt, Julian Adlard, Rosemarie Davidson, Jackie Cook, Alan Donaldson, Huw Dorkins, Helen Gregory, Jacqueline Eason, Catherine Houghton, Julian Barwell, Lucy E. Side, Emma McCann, Alex Murray, Susan Peock, Andrew K. Godwin, Rita K. Schmutzler, Kerstin Rhiem, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Ina Ruehl, Norbert Arnold, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Helmut Deissler, Dorothea Gadzicki, Karin Kast, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Ines Schoenbuchner, Britta Fiebig, Wolfram Heinritz, Dieter Schäfer, Heidrun Gevensleben, Virginie Caux-Moncoutier, Marion Fassy-Colcombet, François Cornelis, Sylvie Mazoyer, Mélanie Léoné, Nadia Boutry-Kryza, Agnès Hardouin, Pascaline Berthet, Danièle Muller, Jean-Pierre Fricker, Isabelle Mortemousque, Pascal Pujol, Isabelle Coupier, Marine Lebrun, Caroline Kientz, Michel Longy, Nicolas Sevenet, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Claudine Isaacs, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de La Hoya, Tuomas Heikkinen, Kristiina Aittomäki, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Penny Soucy, Martine Dumont, Jacques Simard, Marco Montagna, Silvia Tognazzo, Emma D’Andrea, Stephen Fox, Max Yan, Tim Rebbeck, Olufunmilayo Olopade, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Henry T. Lynch, Patricia A. Ganz, Gail E. Tomlinson, Xianshu Wang, Zachary Fredericksen, Vernon S. Pankratz, Noralane M. Lindor, Csilla Szabo, Kenneth Offit, Rita Sakr, Mia Gaudet, Jasmine Bhatia, Noah Kauff, Christian F. Singer, Muy-Kheng Tea, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Anneliese Fink-Retter, Phuong L. Mai, Mark H. Greene, Evgeny Imyanitov, Frances P. O’Malley, Hilmi Ozcelik, Gordon Glendon, Amanda E. Toland, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Mads Thomassen, Torben A. Kruse, Uffe Birk Jensen, Anne-Bine Skytte, Maria A. Caligo, Maria Soller, Karin Henriksson, von Anna Wachenfeldt, Brita Arver, Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Per Karlsson, Yuan Chun Ding, Susan L. Neuhausen, Mary Beattie, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Kirsten B. Moysich, Katherine L. Nathanson, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Gross, Esther M. John, Mary B. Daly, Saundra M. Buys, Melissa C. Southey, John L. Hopper, Mary Beth Terry, Wendy Chung, Alexander F. Miron, David Goldgar, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton, Irene L. Andrulis, Antonis C. Antoniou

Date Published: 1st Dec 2011

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: F. Schoneweck, E. Kuhnt, M. Scholz, F. M. Brunkhorst, A. Scherag

Date Published: 30th Apr 2015

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: bacterial infectious disease, pneumonia

Abstract (Expand)

Recent studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that significantly modify breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Since these risk modifiers were originally identified as genetic risk factors for breast cancer in genome-wide association studies (GWASs), additional risk modifiers for BRCA1 and BRCA2 may be identified from promising signals discovered in breast cancer GWAS. A total of 350 SNPs identified as candidate breast cancer risk factors (P \textless 1 x 10(-3)) in two breast cancer GWAS studies were genotyped in 3451 BRCA1 and 2006 BRCA2 mutation carriers from nine centers. Associations with breast cancer risk were assessed using Cox models weighted for penetrance. Eight SNPs in BRCA1 carriers and 12 SNPs in BRCA2 carriers, representing an enrichment over the number expected, were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (P(trend) \textless 0.01). The minor alleles of rs6138178 in SNRPB and rs6602595 in CAMK1D displayed the strongest associations in BRCA1 carriers (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90, P(trend) = 3.6 x 10(-4) and HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10-1.41, P(trend) = 4.2 x 10(-4)), whereas rs9393597 in LOC134997 and rs12652447 in FBXL7 showed the strongest associations in BRCA2 carriers (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.25-1.92, P(trend) = 6 x 10(-5) and HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16-1.62, P(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-4)). The magnitude and direction of the associations were consistent with the original GWAS. In subsequent risk assessment studies, the loci appeared to interact multiplicatively for breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Promising candidate SNPs from GWAS were identified as modifiers of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Upon further validation, these SNPs together with other genetic and environmental factors may improve breast cancer risk assessment in these populations.

Authors: Xianshu Wang, V. Shane Pankratz, Zachary Fredericksen, Robert Tarrell, Mary Karaus, Lesley McGuffog, Paul D. P. Pharaoh, Bruce A. J. Ponder, Alison M. Dunning, Susan Peock, Margaret Cook, Clare Oliver, Debra Frost, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Sylvie Mazoyer, Claude Houdayer, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Maartje J. Hooning, Marjolijn J. Ligtenberg, Amanda Spurdle, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Rita K. Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Christian F. Singer, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Catherina Dressler, Anneliese Fink, Csilla I. Szabo, Michal Zikan, Lenka Foretova, Kathleen Claes, Gilles Thomas, Robert N. Hoover, David J. Hunter, Stephen J. Chanock, Douglas F. Easton, Antonis C. Antoniou, Fergus J. Couch

Date Published: 15th Jul 2010

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

INTRODUCTION Several common alleles have been shown to be associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Recent genome-wide association studies of breast cancerr have identified eight additional breast cancer susceptibility loci: rs1011970 (9p21, CDKN2A/B), rs10995190 (ZNF365), rs704010 (ZMIZ1), rs2380205 (10p15), rs614367 (11q13), rs1292011 (12q24), rs10771399 (12p11 near PTHLH) and rs865686 (9q31.2). METHODS To evaluate whether these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers and analysed the associations with breast cancer risk within a retrospective likelihood framework. RESULTS Only SNP rs10771399 near PTHLH was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.94, P-trend = 3 \times 10-4). The association was restricted to mutations proven or predicted to lead to absence of protein expression (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 3.1 \times 10-5, P-difference = 0.03). Four SNPs were associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers: rs10995190, P-trend = 0.015; rs1011970, P-trend = 0.048; rs865686, 2df-P = 0.007; rs1292011 2df-P = 0.03. rs10771399 (PTHLH) was predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 4 \times 10-5) and there was marginal evidence of association with ER-negative breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.00, P-trend = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS The present findings, in combination with previously identified modifiers of risk, will ultimately lead to more accurate risk prediction and an improved understanding of the disease etiology in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors: Antonis C. Antoniou, Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker, Penny Soucy, Jonathan Beesley, Xiaoqing Chen, Lesley McGuffog, Andrew Lee, Daniel Barrowdale, Sue Healey, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Maria A. Caligo, Niklas Loman, Katja Harbst, Annika Lindblom, Brita Arver, Richard Rosenquist, Per Karlsson, Kate Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Tim Rebbeck, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Jaworska, Katarzyna Durda, Elżbieta Złowowcka-Perłowska, Ana Osorio, Mercedes Durán, Raquel Andrés, Javier Benítez, Ute Hamann, Frans B. Hogervorst, Theo A. van Os, Senno Verhoef, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Juul Wijnen, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Marjolijn J. Ligtenberg, Mieke Kriege, J. Margriet Collée, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Susan Peock, Debra Frost, Steve D. Ellis, Radka Platte, Elena Fineberg, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Chris Jacobs, Ros Eeles, Julian Adlard, Rosemarie Davidson, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Joan Paterson, Fiona Douglas, Carole Brewer, Shirley Hodgson, Patrick J. Morrison, Lisa Walker, Mark T. Rogers, Alan Donaldson, Huw Dorkins, Andrew K. Godwin, Betsy Bove, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Claude Houdayer, Bruno Buecher, Antoine de Pauw, Sylvie Mazoyer, Alain Calender, Mélanie Léoné, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Olivier Caron, Hagay Sobol, Marc Frenay, Fabienne Prieur, Sandra U. Ferrer, Isabelle Mortemousque, Saundra Buys, Mary Daly, Alexander Miron, Mary U. Terry, John L. Hopper, Esther M. John, Melissa Southey, David Goldgar, Christian F. Singer, Anneliese Fink-Retter, Muy-Kheng Tea, Daphne U. Kaulich, Thomas V. Hansen, Finn C. Nielsen, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Mia Gaudet, Tomas Kirchhoff, Vijai Joseph, Ana Dutra-Clarke, Kenneth Offit, Marion Piedmonte, Judy Kirk, David Cohn, Jean Hurteau, John Byron, James Fiorica, Amanda E. Toland, Marco Montagna, Cristina Oliani, Evgeny Imyanitov, Claudine Isaacs, Laima Tihomirova, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Alex Teulé, J. Del Valle, Simon A. Gayther, Kunle Odunsi, Jenny Gross, Beth Y. Karlan, Edith Olah, Soo-Hwang Teo, Patricia A. Ganz, Mary S. Beattie, Cecelia M. Dorfling, Elizabeth U. van Rensburg, Orland Diez, Ava Kwong, Rita K. Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Nina Ditsch, Norbert Arnold, Simone Heidemann, Dieter Niederacher, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Dorothea Gadzicki, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Helmut Deissler, Andrea Gehrig, Christian Sutter, Karin Kast, Britta Fiebig, Dieter Schäfer, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de La Hoya, Heli Nevanlinna, Taru A. Muranen, Bernard Lespérance, Amanda B. Spurdle, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan C. Ding, Xianshu Wang, Zachary Fredericksen, Vernon S. Pankratz, Noralane M. Lindor, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Bernardo Bonanni, Loris Bernard, Riccardo Dolcetti, Laura Papi, Laura Ottini, Paolo Radice, Mark H. Greene, Jennifer T. Loud, Irene L. Andrulis, Hilmi Ozcelik, Anna U. Mulligan, Gord Glendon, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Uffe B. Jensen, Anne-Bine Skytte, Torben A. Kruse, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Fergus J. Couch, Jacques Simard, Douglas F. Easton

Date Published: 1st Feb 2012

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified variants at 19p13.1 and ZNF365 (10q21.2) as risk factors for breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. We exploredd associations with ovarian cancer and with breast cancer by tumor histopathology for these variants in mutation carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). METHODS Genotyping data for 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers from 40 studies were combined. RESULTS We confirmed associations between rs8170 at 19p13.1 and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers [HR, 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.27; P = 7.42 \times 10(-4)] and between rs16917302 at ZNF365 (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = 0.017) but not rs311499 at 20q13.3 (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94-1.31; P = 0.22) and breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Analyses based on tumor histopathology showed that 19p13 variants were predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, whereas rs16917302 at ZNF365 was mainly associated with ER-positive breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. We also found for the first time that rs67397200 at 19p13.1 was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer for BRCA1 (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.29; P = 3.8 \times 10(-4)) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.52; P = 1.8 \times 10(-3)). CONCLUSIONS 19p13.1 and ZNF365 are susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer and ER subtypes of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. IMPACT These findings can lead to an improved understanding of tumor development and may prove useful for breast and ovarian cancer risk prediction for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors: Fergus J. Couch, Mia M. Gaudet, Antonis C. Antoniou, Susan J. Ramus, Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker, Penny Soucy, Jonathan Beesley, Xiaoqing Chen, Xianshu Wang, Tomas Kirchhoff, Lesley McGuffog, Daniel Barrowdale, Andrew Lee, Sue Healey, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Irene L. Andrulis, Hilmi Ozcelik, Anna Marie Mulligan, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Uffe Birk Jensen, Anne-Bine Skytte, Torben A. Kruse, Maria A. Caligo, Anna von Wachenfeldt, Gisela Barbany-Bustinza, Niklas Loman, Maria Soller, Hans Ehrencrona, Per Karlsson, Katherine L. Nathanson, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Susan M. Domchek, Ania Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Jaworska, Katarzyna Durda, Elzbieta Zlowocka, Tomasz Huzarski, Tomasz Byrski, Jacek Gronwald, Cezary Cybulski, Bohdan Górski, Ana Osorio, Mercedes Durán, María Isabel Tejada, Javier Benitez, Ute Hamann, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Theo A. van Os, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Juul Wijnen, Marinus J. Blok, Marleen Kets, Maartje J. Hooning, Rogier A. Oldenburg, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Susan Peock, Debra Frost, Steve D. Ellis, Radka Platte, Elena Fineberg, D. Gareth Evans, Chris Jacobs, Rosalind A. Eeles, Julian Adlard, Rosemarie Davidson, Diana M. Eccles, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Joan Paterson, Carole Brewer, Fiona Douglas, Shirley V. Hodgson, Patrick J. Morrison, Lisa Walker, Mary E. Porteous, M. John Kennedy, Lucy E. Side, Betsy Bove, Andrew K. Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Marion Fassy-Colcombet, Laurent Castera, François Cornelis, Sylvie Mazoyer, Mélanie Léoné, Nadia Boutry-Kryza, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Olivier Caron, Pascal Pujol, Isabelle Coupier, Capucine Delnatte, Linda Akloul, Henry T. Lynch, Carrie L. Snyder, Saundra S. Buys, Mary B. Daly, Marybeth Terry, Wendy K. Chung, Esther M. John, Alexander Miron, Melissa C. Southey, John L. Hopper, David E. Goldgar, Christian F. Singer, Christine Rappaport, Muy-Kheng M. Tea, Anneliese Fink-Retter, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Finn C. Nielsen, A\dhalgeir Arason, Joseph Vijai, Sohela Shah, Kara Sarrel, Mark E. Robson, Marion Piedmonte, Kelly Phillips, Jack Basil, Wendy S. Rubinstein, John Boggess, Katie Wakeley, Amanda Ewart-Toland, Marco Montagna, Simona Agata, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Claudine Isaacs, Ramunas Janavicius, Conxi Lazaro, Ignacio Blanco, Lidia Feliubadalo, Joan Brunet, Simon A. Gayther, Paul P. D. Pharoah, Kunle O. Odunsi, Beth Y. Karlan, Christine S. Walsh, Edith Olah, Soo Hwang Teo, Patricia A. Ganz, Mary S. Beattie, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Cecelia M. Dorfling, Orland Diez, Ava Kwong, Rita K. Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Nina Ditsch, Norbert Arnold, Simone Heidemann, Dieter Niederacher, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Dorothea Gadzicki, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Helmut Deissler, Andrea Gehrig, Christian Sutter, Karin Kast, Britta Fiebig, Wolfram Heinritz, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de La Hoya, Taru A. Muranen, Heli Nevanlinna, Marc D. Tischkowitz, Amanda B. Spurdle, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan Chun Ding, Noralane M. Lindor, Zachary Fredericksen, V. Shane Pankratz, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Monica Barile, Loris Bernard, Alessandra Viel, Giuseppe Giannini, Liliana Varesco, Paolo Radice, Mark H. Greene, Phuong L. Mai, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Kenneth Offit, Jacques Simard

Date Published: 28th Mar 2012

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

Genome-wide association studies of breast cancer have identified multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the minor alleles at three of these SNPs, in FGFR2, TNRC9 and MAP3K1, also confer increased risks of breast cancer for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Three additional SNPs rs3817198 at LSP1, rs13387042 at 2q35 and rs13281615 at 8q24 have since been reported to be associated with breast cancer in the general population, and in this study we evaluated their association with breast cancer risk in 9442 BRCA1 and 5665 BRCA2 mutation carriers from 33 study centres. The minor allele of rs3817198 was associated with increased breast cancer risk only for BRCA2 mutation carriers [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07-1.25, P-trend = 2.8 x 10(-4)]. The best fit for the association of SNP rs13387042 at 2q35 with breast cancer risk was a dominant model for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (BRCA1: HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.25, P = 0.0047; BRCA2: HR = 1.18 95% CI: 1.04-1.33, P = 0.0079). SNP rs13281615 at 8q24 was not associated with breast cancer for either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, but the estimated association for BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.14) was consistent with odds ratio estimates derived from population-based case-control studies. The LSP1 and 2q35 SNPs appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers. There was no evidence that the associations vary by mutation type depending on whether the mutated protein is predicted to be stable or not.

Authors: Antonis C. Antoniou, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Lesley McGuffog, Sue Healey, Heli Nevanlinna, Tuomas Heikkinen, Jacques Simard, Amanda B. Spurdle, Jonathan Beesley, Xiaoqing Chen, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan C. Ding, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Zachary Fredericksen, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernard Peissel, Bernardo Bonanni, Alessandra Viel, Loris Bernard, Paolo Radice, Csilla I. Szabo, Lenka Foretova, Michal Zikan, Kathleen Claes, Mark H. Greene, Phuong L. Mai, Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Irene L. Andrulis, Hilmi Ozcelik, Gord Glendon, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Mads Thomassen, Lone Sunde, Maria A. Caligo, Yael Laitman, Tair Kontorovich, Shimrit Cohen, Bella Kaufman, Efrat Dagan, Ruth Gershoni Baruch, Eitan Friedman, Katja Harbst, Gisela Barbany-Bustinza, Johanna Rantala, Hans Ehrencrona, Per Karlsson, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Ana Osorio, Ignacio Blanco, Adriana Lasa, Javier Benítez, Ute Hamann, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Matti A. Rookus, J. Margriet Collee, Peter Devilee, Marjolijn J. Ligtenberg, Rob B. van der Luijt, Cora M. Aalfs, Quinten Waisfisz, Juul Wijnen, Cornelis E. P. van Roozendaal, Susan Peock, Margaret Cook, Debra Frost, Clare Oliver, Radka Platte, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Rosalind Eeles, Louise Izatt, Rosemarie Davidson, Carol Chu, Diana Eccles, Trevor Cole, Shirley Hodgson, Andrew K. Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Bruno Buecher, Mélanie Léoné, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Audrey Remenieras, Olivier Caron, Gilbert M. Lenoir, Nicolas Sevenet, Michel Longy, Sandra Fert Ferrer, Fabienne Prieur, David Goldgar, Alexander Miron, Esther M. John, Saundra S. Buys, Mary B. Daly, John L. Hopper, Mary Beth Terry, Yosuf Yassin, Christian Singer, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Christine Staudigl, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Rosa Bjork Barkardottir, Tomas Kirchhoff, Prodipto Pal, Kristi Kosarin, Kenneth Offit, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Katie Wakeley, John F. Boggess, Jack Basil, Peter E. Schwartz, Stephanie V. Blank, Amanda E. Toland, Marco Montagna, Cinzia Casella, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Anna Allavena, Rita K. Schmutzler, Beatrix Versmold, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Nina Ditsch, Norbert Arnold, Dieter Niederacher, Helmut Deissler, Britta Fiebig, Christian Suttner, Ines Schönbuchner, Dorothea Gadzicki, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de La Hoya, Karen A. Pooley, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench

Date Published: 15th Nov 2009

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

Mutations in the BRCA1 gene substantially increase a woman’s lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, there is great variation in this increase in risk with several genetic and non-genetic modifiers identified. The BRCA1 protein plays a central role in DNA repair, a mechanism that is particularly instrumental in safeguarding cells against tumorigenesis. We hypothesized that polymorphisms that alter the expression and/or function of BRCA1 carried on the wild-type (non-mutated) copy of the BRCA1 gene would modify the risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. A total of 9874 BRCA1 mutation carriers were available in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) for haplotype analyses of BRCA1. Women carrying the rare allele of single nucleotide polymorphism rs16942 on the wild-type copy of BRCA1 were at decreased risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.95, P = 0.003). Promoter in vitro assays of the major BRCA1 haplotypes showed that common polymorphisms in the regulatory region alter its activity and that this effect may be attributed to the differential binding affinity of nuclear proteins. In conclusion, variants on the wild-type copy of BRCA1 modify risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1 mutations, possibly by altering the efficiency of BRCA1 transcription.

Authors: David G. Cox, Jacques Simard, Daniel Sinnett, Yosr Hamdi, Penny Soucy, Manon Ouimet, Laure Barjhoux, Carole Verny-Pierre, Lesley McGuffog, Sue Healey, Csilla Szabo, Mark H. Greene, Phuong L. Mai, Irene L. Andrulis, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Maria A. Caligo, Eitan Friedman, Yael Laitman, Bella Kaufman, Shani S. Paluch, Åke Borg, Per Karlsson, Marie Stenmark Askmalm, Gisela Barbany Bustinza, Katherine L. Nathanson, Susan M. Domchek, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Javier Benítez, Ute Hamann, Matti A. Rookus, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Cora M. Aalfs, Christi J. van Asperen, Peter Devilee, Hans J. J. P. Gille, Susan Peock, Debra Frost, D. Gareth Evans, Ros Eeles, Louise Izatt, Julian Adlard, Joan Paterson, Jacqueline Eason, Andrew K. Godwin, Marie-Alice Remon, Virginie Moncoutier, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Christine Lasset, Sophie Giraud, Agnès Hardouin, Pascaline Berthet, Hagay Sobol, François Eisinger, Brigitte Bressac de Paillerets, Olivier Caron, Capucine Delnatte, David Goldgar, Alex Miron, Hilmi Ozcelik, Saundra Buys, Melissa C. Southey, Mary Beth Terry, Christian F. Singer, Anne-Catharina Dressler, Muy-Kheng Tea, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Oskar Johannsson, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Jack B. Basil, Stephanie Blank, Amanda E. Toland, Marco Montagna, Claudine Isaacs, Ignacio Blanco, Simon A. Gayther, Kirsten B. Moysich, Rita K. Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Nina Ditsch, Norbert Arnold, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Dorothea Gadzicki, Britta Fiebig, Trinidad Caldes, Rachel Laframboise, Heli Nevanlinna, Xiaoqing Chen, Jonathan Beesley, Amanda B. Spurdle, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan C. Ding, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Paolo Peterlongo, Siranoush Manoukian, Loris Bernard, Paolo Radice, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Sylvie Mazoyer, Olga M. Sinilnikova

Date Published: 1st Dec 2011

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: Adhering to the Mediterranean diet (MeDi) is known to be beneficial with regard to many age-associated diseases including cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes. Recent studies also suggest an impact on cognition and brain structure, and increasing effort is made to track effects down to single nutrients. AIMS: We aimed to review whether two MeDi components, i.e., long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (LC-n3-FA) derived from sea-fish, and plant polyphenols including resveratrol (RSV), exert positive effects on brain health in aging. CONTENT: We summarized health benefits associated with the MeDi and evaluated available studies on the effect of (1) fish-consumption and LC-n3-FA supplementation as well as (2) diet-derived or supplementary polyphenols such as RSV, on cognitive performance and brain structure in animal models and human studies. Also, we discussed possible underlying mechanisms. CONCLUSION: A majority of available studies suggest that consumption of LC-n3-FA with fish or fishoil-supplements exerts positive effects on brain health and cognition in older humans. However, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to draw definite recommendations. Considering polyphenols and RSV, only few controlled studies are available to date, yet the evidence based on animal research and first interventional human trials is promising and warrants further investigation. In addition, the concept of food synergy within the MeDi encourages future trials that evaluate the impact of comprehensive lifestyle patterns to help maintaining cognitive functions into old age.

Authors: S. Huhn, S. Kharabian Masouleh, M. Stumvoll, A. Villringer, A. V. Witte

Date Published: 29th Jul 2015

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: cardiovascular system disease, diabetes mellitus

Abstract (Expand)

Objectives: The concept of compression of morbidity suggests that compressing cognitive morbidity into a shorter lifetime period would result in a better cumulative lifetime cognitive functioning. Some lifestyle factors, like higher education, that are known to protect cognitive functioning in old age and lower dementia risk, could compress cognitive morbidity. Therefore the aim of our study was to investigate whether higher education leads to a better cumulative lifetime cognitive functioning and, hence, the compression of cognitive morbidity. Methods: Data were derived from the population-based Leipzig longitudinal study of the aged (LEILA75+). From 1998-2005, individuals aged 75 years and older underwent up to seven assessments at a 1.5-year interval and a long-term follow-up assessment after 15 years (2013). Analyses on the impact of higher education on compression of cognitive morbidity were carried out via multilevel logistic mixed-models and tobit analyses using the participants’ age as time scale (n=742). Results: The results revealed that more years of education were significantly associated with a better cognitive functioning but not with the age at dementia onset or the age at death. Computation of cumulative lifetime cognitive functioning was weighted for survival probability and indicated a gain of 21 MMSE points during the lifetime period 75 through 100 years of age by having more than 12 years of education compared to having less than 9 years of education. Conclusion: Overall, the findings suggest a compression of cognitive morbidity by higher education prior to dementia onset. More years of education could therefore contribute to a better cognitive functioning even under consideration of survival probability. Hence, efforts to ensure access to higher education for as many people in a population as possible might compress disease burden due to cognitive morbidity.

Authors: F. S. Then, T. Luck, H. Matschinger, M. C. Angermeyer, S. G. Riedel-Heller

Date Published: 1st Mar 2016

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: dementia

Abstract (Expand)

INTRODUCTION: Uniform coordinate systems in neuroimaging research have enabled comprehensive systematic and quantitative meta-analyses. Such approaches are particularly relevant for neuropsychiatric diseases, the understanding of their symptoms, prediction and treatment. Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), a common neurodegenerative syndrome, is characterized by deep alterations in behavior and personality. Investigating this 'nexopathy' elucidates the healthy social and emotional brain. METHODS: Here, we combine three multimodal meta-analyses approaches - anatomical and activation likelihood estimates and behavioral domain profiles - to identify neural correlates of bvFTD in 417 patients and 406 control subjects and to extract mental functions associated with this disease by meta-analyzing functional activation studies in the comprehensive probabilistic functional brain atlas of the BrainMap database. RESULTS: The analyses identify the frontomedian cortex, basal ganglia, anterior insulae and thalamus as most relevant hubs, with a regional dissociation between atrophy and hypometabolism. Neural networks affected by bvFTD were associated with emotion and reward processing, empathy and executive functions (mainly inhibition), suggesting these functions as core domains affected by the disease and finally leading to its clinical symptoms. In contrast, changes in theory of mind or mentalizing abilities seem to be secondary phenomena of executive dysfunctions. CONCLUSIONS: The study creates a novel conceptual framework to understand neuropsychiatric diseases by powerful data-driven meta-analytic approaches that shall be extended to the whole neuropsychiatric spectrum in the future.

Authors: M. L. Schroeter, A. R. Laird, C. Chwiesko, C. Deuschl, E. Schneider, D. Bzdok, S. B. Eickhoff, J. Neumann

Date Published: 26th Apr 2014

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: frontotemporal dementia

Abstract (Expand)

PURPOSE To estimate the risk for contralateral breast cancer in members of BRCA1- and BRCA2-positive families and to determine predictive risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective, multicenter,er, cohort study was performed from 1996 until 2008 and comprised 2,020 women with unilateral breast cancer (index patients, n = 978; relatives, n = 1.42) from 978 families who had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the association of age at first breast cancer with time from first to contralateral breast cancer, stratified by the affected BRCA gene. RESULTS The cumulative risk for contralateral breast cancer 25 years after first breast cancer was 47.4% (95% CI, 38.8% to 56.0%) for patients from families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Members of families with BRCA1 mutations had a 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.2-fold to 2.3-fold) higher risk of contralateral breast cancer than members of families with BRCA2 mutations. Younger age at first breast cancer was associated with a significantly higher risk of contralateral breast cancer in patients with BRCA1 mutation, and a trend was observed in patients with BRCA2 mutation. After 25 years, 62.9% (95% CI, 50.4% to 75.4%) of patients with BRCA1 mutation who were younger than 40 years of age at first breast cancer developed contralateral breast cancer, compared with only 19.6% (95% CI, 5.3% to 33.9%) of those who were older than 50 years of age at first breast cancer. CONCLUSION Contralateral breast cancer risk depends on age at first breast cancer and on the affected BRCA gene, and this risk should be considered in treatment planning.

Authors: Monika K. Graeser, Christoph Engel, Kerstin Rhiem, Dorothea Gadzicki, Ulrich Bick, Karin Kast, Ursula G. Froster, Bettina Schlehe, Astrid Bechtold, Norbert Arnold, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Carolin Nestle-Kraemling, Mohammad Zaino, Markus Loeffler, Marion Kiechle, Alfons Meindl, Dominic Varga, Rita K. Schmutzler

Date Published: 10th Dec 2009

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract

After publication of the original article [1], we were notified that columns in Table 2 were erroneously displayed.

Authors: Nasim Mavaddat, Antonis C. Antoniou, Thea M. Mooij, Maartje J. Hooning, Bernadette A. Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Catherine Noguès, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Olivier Caron, Paul Gesta, Pascal Pujol, Alain Lortholary, Daniel Barrowdale, Debra Frost, D. Gareth Evans, Louise Izatt, Julian Adlard, Ros Eeles, Carole Brewer, Marc Tischkowitz, Alex Henderson, Jackie Cook, Diana Eccles, Klaartje van Engelen, Marian J. E. Mourits, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Linetta B. Koppert, John L. Hopper, Esther M. John, Wendy K. Chung, Irene L. Andrulis, Mary B. Daly, Saundra S. Buys, Javier Benitez, Trinidad Caldes, Anna Jakubowska, Jacques Simard, Christian F. Singer, Yen Tan, Edith Olah, Marie Navratilova, Lenka Foretova, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Brita Arver, Håkan Olsson, Rita K. Schmutzler, Christoph Engel, Karin Kast, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Mary Beth Terry, Roger L. Milne, David E. Goldgar, Matti A. Rookus, Nadine Andrieu, Douglas F. Easton

Date Published: 1st Dec 2020

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

The E/E'-ratio is used as a surrogate parameter for the estimation of the left ventricular enddiastolic pressure. It is assumed that chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure is associated with E/E'-values of more than 15 or at least with intermediate values between 9 – 5. The aim of the present retrospective analysis of the epidemiological echocardiographic cohort of the LIFE-Adult study (Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases) was to evaluate the correlation of NT-BNP (N-terminales propeptid BNP) values to the E/E'-ratio by the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function in this cohort. In 773 participants (pts) standardised transthoracic echocardiography was performed and in 748 pts NT-BNP was analysed. The E/E'-ratio was determined according to the international recommendations by measuring the maximum velocity of the early diastolic inflow by pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography and the basal septal maximum myocardial velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography at early diastole. NT-BNP was determined using commercially available diagnostic tests. Pathological NT-BNP levels were assumed in the range > 222pg/ml. Normal E/E'-ratios as well as normal NT-BNP levels were observed in 91% of all participants. In 1.4% of the pts elevated NT-BNP levels were found in the presence of normal E/E'-ratio. In contrast in 1.1% of the pts elevated E/E'-ratios were found in the presence of normal NT-BNP levels. Most of the pts with heart failure detected by NT-BNP vales > 222pg/ml also showed intermediate E/E'-ratios between 9 and 15 (42pts). In only 0.8% of the pts (5 pts) significantly elevated E/E'-ratios > 15 and pathological NT-BNP levels could be observed (see fig). Only 4 pts with elevated NT-BNP values showed left ventricular systolic dysfunction. E/E'-ratio has to be verified to be suitable for the detection of heart failure patients. The present data show that E/E'-ratio of > 15 is not well correlated to increased NT-BNP levels.

Authors: S. Stöbe, A. Hagendorff, S. Zeynalova, S. Tautenhahn, S. Wirkner, F. Gerardo, D. Jurisch, D. Pfeiffer, M. Loeffler

Date Published: 18th Aug 2016

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are at increased risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. This economic modeling study evaluated different preventive interventions for 30-year-oldd women with a confirmed BRCA (1 or 2) mutation. METHODS A Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and benefits [i.e., quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and life years gained (LYG)] associated with prophylactic bilateral mastectomy (BM), prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), BM plus BSO, BM plus BSO at age 40, and intensified surveillance. Relevant input data was obtained from a large German database including 5902 women with BRCA 1 or 2, and from the literature. The analysis was performed from the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) perspective. In order to assess the robustness of the results, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS With costs of \text€29,434 and a gain in QALYs of 17.7 (LYG 19.9), BM plus BSO at age 30 was less expensive and more effective than the other strategies, followed by BM plus BSO at age 40. Women who were offered the surveillance strategy had the highest costs at the lowest gain in QALYs/LYS. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of cost-saving was 57% for BM plus BSO. At a WTP of 10,000 \text€ per QALY, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 80%. CONCLUSIONS From the SHI perspective, undergoing BM plus immediate BSO should be recommended to BRCA 1 or 2 mutation carriers due to its favorable comparative cost-effectiveness.

Authors: Dirk Müller, Marion Danner, Kerstin Rhiem, Björn Stollenwerk, Christoph Engel, Linda Rasche, Lisa Borsi, Rita Schmutzler, Stephanie Stock

Date Published: 1st Apr 2018

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: Most older adults want to live independently in a familiar environment instead of moving to a nursing home. Preventive home visits based on multidimensional geriatric assessment can be one strategy to support this preference and might additionally reduce health care costs, due to the avoidance of costly nursing home admissions. The purpose of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of preventive home visits from a societal perspective in Germany. METHODS: This study is part of a multi-centre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial aiming at the reduction of nursing home admissions. Participants were older than 80 years and living at home. Up to three home visits were conducted to identify self-care deficits and risk factors, to present recommendations and to implement solutions. The control group received usual care. A cost-utility analysis using quality-adjusted life years (QALY) based on the EQ-5D was performed. Resource utilization was assessed by means of the interview version of a patient questionnaire. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve controlled for prognostic variables was constructed and a sensitivity analysis to control for the influence of the mode of QALY calculation was performed. RESULTS: 278 individuals (intervention group: 133; control group: 145) were included in the analysis. During 18 months follow-up mean adjusted total cost (mean: +4,401 EUR; bootstrapped standard error: 3,019.61 EUR) and number of QALY (mean: 0.0061 QALY; bootstrapped standard error: 0.0388 QALY) were higher in the intervention group, but differences were not significant. For preventive home visits the probability of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <50,000 EUR per QALY was only 15%. The results were robust with respect to the mode of QALY calculation. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated preventive home visits programme is unlikely to be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00644826.

Authors: C. Brettschneider, T. Luck, S. Fleischer, G. Roling, K. Beutner, M. Luppa, J. Behrens, S. G. Riedel-Heller, H. H. Konig

Date Published: 3rd Apr 2015

Publication Type: Not specified

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVES: The study investigated whether high mental demands at work, which have shown to promote a good cognitive functioning in old age, could offset the adverse association between social isolation and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Based on data from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study, the association between cognitive functioning (Verbal Fluency Test, Trail Making Test B) and social isolation (Lubben Social Network Scale) as well as mental demands at work (O*NET database) was analyzed via linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, education, and sampling weights. RESULTS: Cognitive functioning was significantly lower in socially isolated individuals and in individuals working in low mental demands jobs-even in old age after retirement and even after taking into account the educational level. An interaction effect suggested stronger effects of mental demands at work in socially isolated than nonisolated individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that working in high mental-demand jobs could offset the adverse association between social isolation and cognitive functioning. Further research should evaluate how interventions that target social isolation and enhance mentally demanding activities promote a good cognitive functioning in old age.

Authors: F. S. Rodriguez, M. L. Schroeter, A. V. Witte, C. Engel, M. Loffler, J. Thiery, A. Villringer, T. Luck, S. G. Riedel-Heller

Date Published: 4th Jul 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

Introduction LIFE is a epidemiological study aiming at discovering causes of common disorders as well as therapy and diagnostic possibilities. It applies a huge set (currently more then 400) of complex instruments including different kinds of interviews, questionnaires, and technically founded investigations on thousands of Leipzig inhabitants. Correlations in data, e.g., between diseases on the one hand and a combination of life conditions on the other requires high quality data. Data errors affect this data quality. However, avoiding every error is nearly impossible. Therefore, the captured data routinely needs to be validated and revised (curated) in case of error. Methods From the data-perspective, we differentiate between two main types of data errors, syntax or format errors and semantic errors. Syntax errors mostly occur when the data needs to be converted to change its data type, e.g., from text to number or from text to date/time fields. This is often the case when data is captured as text by the data input system but should be centrally managed and analyzed in a different format. Hence, the data conversion is only successful when the input data contains the data in the right format. Data conversion is applied when the data is transfered from data input systems to the central research database collecting all captured data in an integrated and harmonized form. Corrupted data that cannot be converted to the target data type is replaced by a missing value (also called null value, nil etc.). The definition of a default value is not sufficient since the default usually depends on the corresponding question or measurement input field and can strain analysis results when they are not concerned. Moreover, the definition process for every question/input field would be to time-consuming. Semantic errors are much harder to detect than syntax errors. Typically, they are semantically implausible outliers or are part of other artefacts, e.g.,when data of two input fields is mixed up. Currently, we let the detection of semantic errors to a epidemiological quality analysis that is performed by several statisticians. Conversely, syntax errors can be easily technically detected; they are logged when they occur in the process of transferring data from data input systems to the central research database. With respect to both types of errors, syntax and semantic errors, we designed and implemented a software application called Curation-DB allowing to curate (adapt and change) data. In particular, the system lists the logged syntax errors occurring during the data conversion step daily at night. A user can adapt the current input value by specifying a new (target) value for a listed syntax problem. With this specification, the corresponding input value is replaced by the specified value before the next conversion step is started. This specification process can be iteratively applied for a corresponding input value when the syntax problem is not solved by the current specification. The semantic errors need to be first detected separately. Then, a user can specify value changes replacing an existing value with the new specified one. Results & Discussion The Curation-DB application is already in use. Currently, selected quality managers routinely check the listed syntax errors. There are currently more than 2000 of such errors curated. In near future, we will extend this software to manage rules validating research data semantically to automatically detect obvious semantic errors.

Authors: J. Wagner, A. Kiel, Toralf Kirsten

Date Published: 30th Sep 2013

Publication Type: Not specified

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE To identify current clinical practice regarding nutrition and its association with morbidity and mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in Germany. DESIGN Nationwideide prospective, observational, cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence study. SETTING The study included 454 intensive care units from a representative sample of 310 hospitals stratified by size. PATIENTS Participants were 415 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (according to criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference). INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Data were collected by on-site audits of trained external study physicians during randomly scheduled visits during 1 yr. Valid data on nutrition were available for 399 of 415 patients. The data showed that 20.1% of patients received exclusively enteral nutrition, 35.1% exclusively parenteral nutrition, and 34.6% mixed nutrition (parenteral and enteral); 10.3% were not fed at all. Patients with gastrointestinal/intra-abdominal infection, pancreatitis or neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, mechanical ventilation, or septic shock were less likely to receive exclusively enteral nutrition. Median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scores were significantly different among the nutrition groups. Overall hospital mortality was 55.2%. Hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients receiving exclusively parenteral (62.3%) or mixed nutrition (57.1%) than in patients with exclusively enteral nutrition (38.9%) (p = .005). After adjustment for patient morbidity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, presence of septic shock) and treatment factors (mechanical ventilation), multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of parenteral nutrition was significantly predictive of mortality (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.37). CONCLUSIONS Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in German intensive care units received preferentially parenteral or mixed nutrition. The use of parenteral nutrition was associated with an increased risk of death.

Authors: Gunnar Elke, Dirk Schädler, Christoph Engel, Holger Bogatsch, Inez Frerichs, Maximilian Ragaller, Jens Scholz, Frank M. Brunkhorst, Markus Löffler, Konrad Reinhart, Norbert Weiler

Date Published: 2008

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: disease by infectious agent

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies