A comprehensive 1000 Genomes-based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease

Abstract:

Existing knowledge of genetic variants affecting risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is largely based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis of common SNPs. Leveraging phased haplotypes from the 1000 Genomes Project, we report a GWAS meta-analysis of \sim185,000 CAD cases and controls, interrogating 6.7 million common (minor allele frequency (MAF) \textgreater 0.05) and 2.7 million low-frequency (0.005 \textless MAF \textless 0.05) variants. In addition to confirming most known CAD-associated loci, we identified ten new loci (eight additive and two recessive) that contain candidate causal genes newly implicating biological processes in vessel walls. We observed intralocus allelic heterogeneity but little evidence of low-frequency variants with larger effects and no evidence of synthetic association. Our analysis provides a comprehensive survey of the fine genetic architecture of CAD, showing that genetic susceptibility to this common disease is largely determined by common SNPs of small effect size.   Existing knowledge of genetic variants affecting risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is largely based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis of common SNPs. Leveraging phased haplotypes from the 1000 Genomes Project, we report a GWAS meta-analysis of \sim185,000 CAD cases and controls, interrogating 6.7 million common (minor allele frequency (MAF) \textgreater 0.05) and 2.7 million low-frequency (0.005 \textless MAF \textless 0.05) variants. In addition to confirming most known CAD-associated loci, we identified ten new loci (eight additive and two recessive) that contain candidate causal genes newly implicating biological processes in vessel walls. We observed intralocus allelic heterogeneity but little evidence of low-frequency variants with larger effects and no evidence of synthetic association. Our analysis provides a comprehensive survey of the fine genetic architecture of CAD, showing that genetic susceptibility to this common disease is largely determined by common SNPs of small effect size.   Existing knowledge of genetic variants affecting risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is largely based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis of common SNPs. Leveraging phased haplotypes from the 1000 Genomes Project, we report a GWAS meta-analysis of \sim185,000 CAD cases and controls, interrogating 6.7 million common (minor allele frequency (MAF) \textgreater 0.05) and 2.7 million low-frequency (0.005 \textless MAF \textless 0.05) variants. In addition to confirming most known CAD-associated loci, we identified ten new loci (eight additive and two recessive) that contain candidate causal genes newly implicating biological processes in vessel walls. We observed intralocus allelic heterogeneity but little evidence of low-frequency variants with larger effects and no evidence of synthetic association. Our analysis provides a comprehensive survey of the fine genetic architecture of CAD, showing that genetic susceptibility to this common disease is largely determined by common SNPs of small effect size.   Existing knowledge of genetic variants affecting risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is largely based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis of common SNPs. Leveraging phased haplotypes from the 1000 Genomes Project, we report a GWAS meta-analysis of \sim185,000 CAD cases and controls, interrogating 6.7 million common (minor allele frequency (MAF) \textgreater 0.05) and 2.7 million low-frequency (0.005 \textless MAF \textless 0.05) variants. In addition to confirming most known CAD-associated loci, we identified ten new loci (eight additive and two recessive) that contain candidate causal genes newly implicating biological processes in vessel walls. We observed intralocus allelic heterogeneity but little evidence of low-frequency variants with larger effects and no evidence of synthetic association. Our analysis provides a comprehensive survey of the fine genetic architecture of CAD, showing that genetic susceptibility to this common disease is largely determined by common SNPs of small effect size. //  Existing knowledge of genetic variants affecting risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is largely based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis of common SNPs. Leveraging phased haplotypes from the 1000 Genomes Project, we report a GWAS meta-analysis of \sim185,000 CAD cases and controls, interrogating 6.7 million common (minor allele frequency (MAF) \textgreater 0.05) and 2.7 million low-frequency (0.005 \textless MAF \textless 0.05) variants. In addition to confirming most known CAD-associated loci, we identified ten new loci (eight additive and two recessive) that contain candidate causal genes newly implicating biological processes in vessel walls. We observed intralocus allelic heterogeneity but little evidence of low-frequency variants with larger effects and no evidence of synthetic association. Our analysis provides a comprehensive survey of the fine genetic architecture of CAD, showing that genetic susceptibility to this common disease is largely determined by common SNPs of small effect size.

DOI: 10.1038/ng.3396

Projects: Genetical Statistics and Systems Biology

Publication type: Journal article

Journal: Nature genetics

Human Diseases: No Human Disease specified

Citation: Nat Genet 47(10):1121-1130

Date Published: 1st Oct 2015

Registered Mode: imported from a bibtex file

Author: CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Consortium

Help
help Submitter
Citation
A comprehensive 1000 Genomes–based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease. (2015). In Nature Genetics (Vol. 47, Issue 10, pp. 1121–1130). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3396
Activity

Views: 1001

Created: 14th Sep 2020 at 13:44

Last updated: 7th Dec 2021 at 17:58

help Tags

This item has not yet been tagged.

help Attributions

None

Related items

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies