Publications

959 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 959

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in plasma are associated with cardiovascular risk in the general population. Whether lipoprotein(a) concentrations or LPA genetic variants predict long-term mortality in patients with established coronary heart disease remains less clear. METHODS: We obtained data from 3313 patients with established coronary heart disease in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study. We tested associations of tertiles of lipoprotein(a) concentration in plasma and two LPA single-nucleotide polymorphisms ([SNPs] rs10455872 and rs3798220) with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality by Cox regression analysis and with severity of disease by generalised linear modelling, with and without adjustment for age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, systolic blood pressure, BMI, smoking status, estimated glomerular filtration rate, LDL-cholesterol concentration, and use of lipid-lowering therapy. Results for plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations were validated in five independent studies involving 10 195 patients with established coronary heart disease. Results for genetic associations were replicated through large-scale collaborative analysis in the GENIUS-CHD consortium, comprising 106 353 patients with established coronary heart disease and 19 332 deaths in 22 studies or cohorts. FINDINGS: The median follow-up was 9.9 years. Increased severity of coronary heart disease was associated with lipoprotein(a) concentrations in plasma in the highest tertile (adjusted hazard radio [HR] 1.44, 95% CI 1.14-1.83) and the presence of either LPA SNP (1.88, 1.40-2.53). No associations were found in LURIC with all-cause mortality (highest tertile of lipoprotein(a) concentration in plasma 0.95, 0.81-1.11 and either LPA SNP 1.10, 0.92-1.31) or cardiovascular mortality (0.99, 0.81-1.2 and 1.13, 0.90-1.40, respectively) or in the validation studies. INTERPRETATION: In patients with prevalent coronary heart disease, lipoprotein(a) concentrations and genetic variants showed no associations with mortality. We conclude that these variables are not useful risk factors to measure to predict progression to death after coronary heart disease is established. FUNDING: Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technical Development (AtheroRemo and RiskyCAD), INTERREG IV Oberrhein Programme, Deutsche Nierenstiftung, Else-Kroener Fresenius Foundation, Deutsche Stiftung fur Herzforschung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Saarland University, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Willy Robert Pitzer Foundation, and Waldburg-Zeil Clinics Isny.

Authors: S. Zewinger, M. E. Kleber, V. Tragante, R. O. McCubrey, A. F. Schmidt, K. Direk, U. Laufs, C. Werner, W. Koenig, D. Rothenbacher, U. Mons, L. P. Breitling, H. Brenner, R. T. Jennings, I. Petrakis, S. Triem, M. Klug, A. Filips, S. Blankenberg, C. Waldeyer, C. Sinning, R. B. Schnabel, K. J. Lackner, E. Vlachopoulou, O. Nygard, G. F. T. Svingen, E. R. Pedersen, G. S. Tell, J. Sinisalo, M. S. Nieminen, R. Laaksonen, S. Trompet, R. A. J. Smit, N. Sattar, J. W. Jukema, H. V. Groesdonk, G. Delgado, T. Stojakovic, A. P. Pilbrow, V. A. Cameron, A. M. Richards, R. N. Doughty, Y. Gong, R. Cooper-DeHoff, J. Johnson, M. Scholz, F. Beutner, J. Thiery, J. G. Smith, R. O. Vilmundarson, R. McPherson, A. F. R. Stewart, S. Cresci, P. A. Lenzini, J. A. Spertus, O. Olivieri, D. Girelli, N. I. Martinelli, A. Leiherer, C. H. Saely, H. Drexel, A. Mundlein, P. S. Braund, C. P. Nelson, N. J. Samani, D. Kofink, I. E. Hoefer, G. Pasterkamp, A. A. Quyyumi, Y. A. Ko, J. A. Hartiala, H. Allayee, W. H. W. Tang, S. L. Hazen, N. Eriksson, C. Held, E. Hagstrom, L. Wallentin, A. Akerblom, A. Siegbahn, I. Karp, C. Labos, L. Pilote, J. C. Engert, J. M. Brophy, G. Thanassoulis, P. Bogaty, W. Szczeklik, M. Kaczor, M. Sanak, S. S. Virani, C. M. Ballantyne, V. V. Lee, E. Boerwinkle, M. V. Holmes, B. D. Horne, A. Hingorani, F. W. Asselbergs, R. S. Patel, B. K. Kramer, H. Scharnagl, D. Fliser, W. Marz, T. Speer

Date Published: 2nd Jun 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: The PHQ-15 is widely used as an open access screening instrument for somatic symptoms in different health care settings. The objectives of the study were to contribute to the construct validity and to generate normative data for the PHQ-15. METHODS: The survey was conducted in the general population in Germany from August 2011 to November 2014 (n=9250). All participants underwent an extensive core assessment including a set of questionnaires. RESULTS: Men reported significantly less (p<0.001) physical symptoms than women (4.6 [SD=3.6] vs. 6.3 [SD=4.1]). The PHQ-15 total score was strongly correlated with the physical component of quality of life (r=-0.58), fatigue (r=0.56), anxiety (r=0.54) and sleep problems (r=0.54). While high socioeconomic status was associated with low prevalences of all complaints, obesity was associated with some of the complaints, especially shortness of breath and pain in arms, legs, and joints. Normative data for the PHQ-15 were generated for men and women. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation confirms the burden caused by somatic symptoms in terms of impaired physical quality of life. In association with psychosocial consequences such as anxiety as well as sleep problems, future studies should also focus on the disease burden of somatic symptoms. In addition, the normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparison with other populations.

Authors: A. Hinz, J. Ernst, H. Glaesmer, E. Brahler, F. G. Rauscher, K. Petrowski, R. D. Kocalevent

Date Published: 27th May 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

By the modern molecular biological approaches that exploit the availability of high quality gene expression data, it is made clear that flexible and robust responses of cellular programs are encoded in the relations between gene expression values. These relations naturally define a network where they stand for edges between the nodes that stand for the genes. The wiring of these networks often found to be dysregulated in cancer. Different system biological approaches that rely on correlations, differential equations and logical analysis are used to probe these relations in gene expression data especially. In our work we investigated selected biological functions in aggressive germinal center B-cell lymphoma in terms of a logical analysis of gene-regulation in Boolean space and a signal propagation algorithm considering network topology based on gene expression data. We especially aimed at studying the activity of the MYC gene as a key player. It is shown that the functional output of a gene network is affected by the states of the genes and also by the wirings between them. Our results support the key function of MYC in lymphoma biology. In addition, we showed that genes can alter functional output of the network by alternative mechanisms like reducing the variance in propagating signal and locking it to a certain level.

Authors: V. Cakir, H. Loeffler-Wirth, A. Arakelyan, H. Binder

Date Published: 17th May 2017

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: B-cell lymphoma

Abstract (Expand)

Background/Objective: The Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) is often used to assess dispositional optimism. The aims of this study were to test psychometric properties of the LOT-R, to provide normative scores, and to test the association between optimism and several psychological, sociodemographic, and behavioral factors. Method: A randomly selected German general population community sample with an age range of 18-80 years (N = 9,711) was surveyed. Results: The Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) proved two (correlated) factors: Optimism and Pessimism. Invariance tests across gender and age groups confirmed metric invariance. There were only small gender differences in the LOT-R total score (M = 16.4 for females and M = 16.1 for males). The correlation between the subscales Optimism and Pessimism was strong for young and well educated people. Low optimism mean scores were observed for unemployed people, people with low income, smokers, and obese people. Normative scores of the LOT-R are provided. Conclusions: The study confirmed the bidimensional structure of the LOT-R and invariance across age and gender. We can recommend using this instrument for measuring dispositional optimism and pessimism in epidemiological research and clinical practice.

Authors: A. Hinz, C. Sander, H. Glaesmer, E. Brähler, M. Zenger, A. Hilbert, R. D. Kocalevent

Date Published: 1st May 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

To identify common alleles associated with different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we pooled data from multiple genome-wide genotyping projects totaling 25,509 EOC cases and 40,941 controls. We identified nine new susceptibility loci for different EOC histotypes: six for serous EOC histotypes (3q28, 4q32.3, 8q21.11, 10q24.33, 18q11.2 and 22q12.1), two for mucinous EOC (3q22.3 and 9q31.1) and one for endometrioid EOC (5q12.3). We then performed meta-analysis on the results for high-grade serous ovarian cancer with the results from analysis of 31,448 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, including 3,887 mutation carriers with EOC. This identified three additional susceptibility loci at 2q13, 8q24.1 and 12q24.31. Integrated analyses of genes and regulatory biofeatures at each locus predicted candidate susceptibility genes, including OBFC1, a new candidate susceptibility gene for low-grade and borderline serous EOC.

Authors: Catherine M. Phelan, Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Siddhartha P. Kar, Kate Lawrenson, Stacey J. Winham, Joe Dennis, Ailith Pirie, Marjorie J. Riggan, Ganna Chornokur, Madalene A. Earp, Paulo C. Lyra, Janet M. Lee, Simon Coetzee, Jonathan Beesley, Lesley McGuffog, Penny Soucy, Ed Dicks, Andrew Lee, Daniel Barrowdale, Julie Lecarpentier, Goska Leslie, Cora M. Aalfs, Katja K. H. Aben, Marcia Adams, Julian Adlard, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia Antonenkova, Gerasimos Aravantinos, Norbert Arnold, Banu K. Arun, Brita Arver, Jacopo Azzollini, Judith Balmaña, Susana N. Banerjee, Laure Barjhoux, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Yukie Bean, Matthias W. Beckmann, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Javier Benitez, Marina Bermisheva, Marcus Q. Bernardini, Michael J. Birrer, Line Bjorge, Amanda Black, Kenneth Blankstein, Marinus J. Blok, Clara Bodelon, Natalia Bogdanova, Anders Bojesen, Bernardo Bonanni, Åke Borg, Angela R. Bradbury, James D. Brenton, Carole Brewer, Louise Brinton, Per Broberg, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Fiona Bruinsma, Joan Brunet, Bruno Buecher, Ralf Butzow, Saundra S. Buys, Trinidad Caldes, Maria A. Caligo, Ian Campbell, Rikki Cannioto, Michael E. Carney, Terence Cescon, Salina B. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen Chanock, Xiao Qing Chen, Yoke-Eng Chiew, Jocelyne Chiquette, Wendy K. Chung, Kathleen B. M. Claes, Thomas Conner, Linda S. Cook, Jackie Cook, Daniel W. Cramer, Julie M. Cunningham, Aimee A. D’Aloisio, Mary B. Daly, Francesca Damiola, Sakaeva Dina Damirovna, Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Fanny Dao, Rosemarie Davidson, Anna deFazio, Capucine Delnatte, Kimberly F. Doheny, Orland Diez, Yuan Chun Ding, Jennifer Anne Doherty, Susan M. Domchek, Cecilia M. Dorfling, Thilo Dörk, Laure Dossus, Mercedes Duran, Matthias Dürst, Bernd Dworniczak, Diana Eccles, Todd Edwards, Ros Eeles, Ursula Eilber, Bent Ejlertsen, Arif B. Ekici, Steve Ellis, Mingajeva Elvira, Kevin H. Eng, Christoph Engel, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Sarah Ferguson, Sandra Fert Ferrer, James M. Flanagan, Zachary C. Fogarty, Renée T. Fortner, Florentia Fostira, William D. Foulkes, George Fountzilas, Brooke L. Fridley, Tara M. Friebel, Eitan Friedman, Debra Frost, Patricia A. Ganz, Judy Garber, María J. García, Vanesa Garcia-Barberan, Andrea Gehrig, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Graham G. Giles, Rosalind Glasspool, Gord Glendon, Andrew K. Godwin, David E. Goldgar, Teodora Goranova, Martin Gore, Mark H. Greene, Jacek Gronwald, Stephen Gruber, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Ute Hamann, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Patricia A. Harrington, Holly R. Harris, Jan Hauke, Alexander Hein, Alex Henderson, Michelle A. T. Hildebrandt, Peter Hillemanns, Shirley Hodgson, Claus K. Høgdall, Estrid Høgdall, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Helene Holland, Maartje J. Hooning, Karen Hosking, Ruea-Yea Huang, Peter J. Hulick, Jillian Hung, David J. Hunter, David G. Huntsman, Tomasz Huzarski, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Claudine Isaacs, Edwin S. Iversen, Louise Izatt, Angel Izquierdo, Anna Jakubowska, Paul James, Ramunas Janavicius, Mats Jernetz, Allan Jensen, Uffe Birk Jensen, Esther M. John, Sharon Johnatty, Michael E. Jones, Päivi Kannisto, Beth Y. Karlan, Anthony Karnezis, Karin Kast, Catherine J. Kennedy, Elza Khusnutdinova, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Johanna I. Kiiski, Sung-Won Kim, Susanne K. Kjaer, Martin Köbel, Reidun K. Kopperud, Torben A. Kruse, Jolanta Kupryjanczyk, Ava Kwong, Yael Laitman, Diether Lambrechts, Nerea Larrañaga, Melissa C. Larson, Conxi Lazaro, Nhu D. Le, Loic Le Marchand, Jong Won Lee, Shashikant B. Lele, Arto Leminen, Dominique Leroux, Jenny Lester, Fabienne Lesueur, Douglas A. Levine, Dong Liang, Clemens Liebrich, Jenna Lilyquist, Loren Lipworth, Jolanta Lissowska, Karen H. Lu, Jan Lubinński, Craig Luccarini, Lene Lundvall, Phuong L. Mai, Gustavo Mendoza-Fandiño, Siranoush Manoukian, Leon F. A. G. Massuger, Taymaa May, Sylvie Mazoyer, Jessica N. McAlpine, Valerie McGuire, John R. McLaughlin, Iain McNeish, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Alfons Meindl, Usha Menon, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Melissa A. Merritt, Roger L. Milne, Gillian Mitchell, Francesmary Modugno, Joanna Moes-Sosnowska, Melissa Moffitt, Marco Montagna, Kirsten B. Moysich, Anna Marie Mulligan, Jacob Musinsky, Katherine L. Nathanson, Lotte Nedergaard, Roberta B. Ness, Susan L. Neuhausen, Heli Nevanlinna, Dieter Niederacher, Robert L. Nussbaum, Kunle Odunsi, Edith Olah, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Håkan Olsson, Curtis Olswold, David M. O’Malley, Kai-Ren Ong, N. Charlotte Onland-Moret, Nicholas Orr, Sandra Orsulic, Ana Osorio, Domenico Palli, Laura Papi, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, James Paul, Celeste L. Pearce, Inge Søkilde Pedersen, Petra H. M. Peeters, Bernard Peissel, Ana Peixoto, Tanja Pejovic, Liisa M. Pelttari, Jennifer B. Permuth, Paolo Peterlongo, Lidia Pezzani, Georg Pfeiler, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Marion Piedmonte, Malcolm C. Pike, Anna M. Piskorz, Samantha R. Poblete, Timea Pocza, Elizabeth M. Poole, Bruce Poppe, Mary E. Porteous, Fabienne Prieur, Darya Prokofyeva, Elizabeth Pugh, Miquel Angel Pujana, Pascal Pujol, Paolo Radice, Johanna Rantala, Christine Rappaport-Fuerhauser, Gad Rennert, Kerstin Rhiem, Patricia Rice, Andrea Richardson, Mark Robson, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Cristina Rodríguez-Antona, Jane Romm, Matti A. Rookus, Mary Anne Rossing, Joseph H. Rothstein, Anja Rudolph, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Helga B. Salvesen, Dale P. Sandler, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Leigha Senter, V. Wendy Setiawan, Gianluca Severi, Priyanka Sharma, Tameka Shelford, Nadeem Siddiqui, Lucy E. Side, Weiva Sieh, Christian F. Singer, Hagay Sobol, Honglin Song, Melissa C. Southey, Amanda B. Spurdle, Zsofia Stadler, Doris Steinemann, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Lara E. Sucheston-Campbell, Grzegorz Sukiennicki, Rebecca Sutphen, Christian Sutter, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Csilla I. Szabo, Lukasz Szafron, Yen Y. Tan, Jack A. Taylor, Muy-Kheng Tea, Manuel R. Teixeira, Soo-Hwang Teo, Kathryn L. Terry, Pamela J. Thompson, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen, Darcy L. Thull, Laima Tihomirova, Anna V. Tinker, Marc Tischkowitz, Silvia Tognazzo, Amanda Ewart Toland, Alicia Tone, Britton Trabert, Ruth C. Travis, Antonia Trichopoulou, Nadine Tung, Shelley S. Tworoger, Anne M. van Altena, David van den Berg, Annemarie H. van der Hout, Rob B. van der Luijt, Mattias van Heetvelde, Els van Nieuwenhuysen, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Adriaan Vanderstichele, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Ana Vega, Digna Velez Edwards, Ignace Vergote, Robert A. Vierkant, Joseph Vijai, Athanassios Vratimos, Lisa Walker, Christine Walsh, Dorothea Wand, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Penelope M. Webb, Clarice R. Weinberg, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S. Whittemore, Juul T. Wijnen, Lynne R. Wilkens, Alicja Wolk, Michelle Woo, Xifeng Wu, Anna H. Wu, Hannah Yang, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Argyrios Ziogas, Kristin K. Zorn, Steven A. Narod, Douglas F. Easton, Christopher I. Amos, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Susan J. Ramus, Laura Ottini, Marc T. Goodman, Sue K. Park, Linda E. Kelemen, Harvey A. Risch, Mads Thomassen, Kenneth Offit, Jacques Simard, Rita Katharina Schmutzler, Dennis Hazelett, Alvaro N. Monteiro, Fergus J. Couch, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Ellen L. Goode, Thomas A. Sellers, Simon A. Gayther, Antonis C. Antoniou, Paul D. P. Pharoah

Date Published: 1st May 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND Conventional anthropometric measurements are time consuming and require well trained medical staff. To use three-dimensional whole body laser scanning in daily clinical work, validity, andd reliability have to be confirmed. METHODS We compared a whole body laser scanner with conventional anthropometry in a group of 473 children and adolescents from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE-Child). Concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were calculated separately for sex, weight, and age to assess validity. Overall CCC (OCCC) was used to analyze intraobserver reliability. RESULTS Body height and the circumferences of waist, hip, upper arm, and calf had an \textquotedblexcellent\textquotedbl (CCC ≥0.9); neck and thigh circumference, a \textquotedblgood\textquotedbl (CCC ≥0.7); and head circumference, a \textquotedbllow\textquotedbl (CCC \textless 0.5) degree of concordance over the complete study population. We observed dependencies of validity on sex, weight, and age. Intraobserver reliability of both techniques is \textquotedblexcellent\textquotedbl (OCCC ≥0.9). CONCLUSION Scanning is faster, requires less intensive staff training and provides more information. It can be used in an epidemiologic setting with children and adolescents but some measurements should be considered with caution due to reduced agreement with conventional anthropometry.

Authors: Fabian Glock, Mandy Vogel, Stephanie Naumann, Andreas Kuehnapfel, Markus Scholz, Andreas Hiemisch, Toralf Kirsten, Kristin Rieger, Antje Koerner, Markus Loeffler, Wieland Kiess

Date Published: 1st May 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND: Completion of advance directives (ADs) and power of attorney (POA) documents may protect a person's autonomy in future health care situations when the individual lacks decisional capacity. As such situations become naturally much more common in old age, we specifically aimed at providing information on (i) the frequency of ADs/POA in oldest-old individuals and (ii) factors associated with having completed ADs/POA. METHODS: We analyzed data of oldest-old primary care patients (85+ years; including community-dwelling and institutionalized individuals) within the German AgeQualiDe study. Patients were initially recruited via their general practitioners (GPs). We calculated frequencies of ADs and POA for health care with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and used multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between having ADs and POA and participants' socio-demographic, cognitive, functional, and health-related characteristics. RESULTS: Among 868 GP patients participating in AgeQualiDe (response = 90.9%), n = 161 had dementia and n = 3 were too exhausted/ill to answer the questions. Out of the remaining 704 (81.1%) dementia-free patients (mean age = 88.7 years; SD = 3.0), 69.0% (95%-CI = 65.6-72.4) stated to having ADs and 64.6% (95%-CI = 61.1-68.2) to having a POA for health care. Individual characteristics did not explain much of the variability of the presence/absence of ADs and POA (regression models: Nagelkerke's R(2) = 0.034/0.051). The most frequently stated reasons for not having ADs were that the older adults trust their relatives or physicians to make the right decisions for them when necessary (stated by 59.4% and 44.8% of those without ADs). Among the older adults with ADs, the majority had received assistance in its preparation (79.0%), most frequently from their children/grandchildren (38.3%). Children/grandchildren were also the most frequently stated group of designated persons (76.7%) for those with a POA for health care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a high dissemination of ADs and POA for health care in the oldest-old in Germany. Some adults without ADs/POA perhaps would have completed advance care documents, if they had had received more information and support. When planning programs to offer advanced care planning to the oldest old, it might be helpful to respond to these specific needs, and also to be sensitive to attitudinal differences in this target group.

Authors: T. Luck, F. S. Rodriguez, B. Wiese, C. van der Leeden, K. Heser, H. Bickel, J. In der Schmitten, H. H. Koenig, S. Weyerer, S. Mamone, T. Mallon, M. Wagner, D. Weeg, A. Fuchs, C. Brettschneider, J. Werle, M. Scherer, W. Maier, S. G. Riedel-Heller

Date Published: 13th Apr 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies