Publications

265 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 265

Abstract (Expand)

Analysis of 4,405 variants in 89,050 European subjects from 41 case-control studies identified three independent association signals for estrogen-receptor-positive tumors at 11q13. The strongest signal maps to a transcriptional enhancer element in which the G allele of the best candidate causative variant rs554219 increases risk of breast cancer, reduces both binding of ELK4 transcription factor and luciferase activity in reporter assays, and may be associated with low cyclin D1 protein levels in tumors. Another candidate variant, rs78540526, lies in the same enhancer element. Risk association signal 2, rs75915166, creates a GATA3 binding site within a silencer element. Chromatin conformation studies demonstrate that these enhancer and silencer elements interact with each other and with their likely target gene, CCND1.

Authors: Juliet D. French, Maya Ghoussaini, Stacey L. Edwards, Kerstin B. Meyer, Kyriaki Michailidou, Shahana Ahmed, Sofia Khan, Mel J. Maranian, Martin O’Reilly, Kristine M. Hillman, Joshua A. Betts, Thomas Carroll, Peter J. Bailey, Ed Dicks, Jonathan Beesley, Jonathan Tyrer, Ana-Teresa Maia, Andrew Beck, Nicholas W. Knoblauch, Constance Chen, Peter Kraft, Daniel Barnes, Anna González-Neira, M. Rosario Alonso, Daniel Herrero, Daniel C. Tessier, Daniel Vincent, Francois Bacot, Craig Luccarini, Caroline Baynes, Don Conroy, Joe Dennis, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, John L. Hopper, Melissa C. Southey, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Annegien Broeks, Senno Verhoef, Sten Cornelissen, Kenneth Muir, Artitaya Lophatananon, Sarah Stewart-Brown, Pornthep Siriwanarangsan, Peter A. Fasching, Christian R. Loehberg, Arif B. Ekici, Matthias W. Beckmann, Julian Peto, Isabel Dos Santos Silva, Nichola Johnson, Zoe Aitken, Elinor J. Sawyer, Ian Tomlinson, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller, Frederik Marme, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Barbara Burwinkel, Pascal Guénel, Thérèse Truong, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Florence Menegaux, Stig E. Bojesen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Sune F. Nielsen, Henrik Flyger, Roger L. Milne, M. Pilar Zamora, Jose Ignacio Arias Perez, Javier Benitez, Hoda Anton-Culver, Hermann Brenner, Heiko Müller, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Alfons Meindl, Peter Lichtner, Rita K. Schmutzler, Christoph Engel, Hiltrud Brauch, Ute Hamann, Christina Justenhoven, Kirsimari Aaltonen, Päivi Heikkilä, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Keitaro Matsuo, Hidemi Ito, Hiroji Iwata, Aiko Sueta, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Natalia N. Antonenkova, Thilo Dörk, Annika Lindblom, Sara Margolin, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Anna H. Wu, Chiu-Chen Tseng, David van den Berg, Daniel O. Stram, Diether Lambrechts, Stephanie Peeters, Ann Smeets, Giuseppe Floris, Jenny Chang-Claude, Anja Rudolph, Stefan Nickels, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernardo Bonanni, Domenico Sardella, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Vernon S. Pankratz, Adam Lee, Graham G. Giles, Gianluca Severi, Laura Baglietto, Christopher A. Haiman, Brian E. Henderson, Fredrick Schumacher, Loic Le Marchand, Jacques Simard, Mark S. Goldberg, France Labrèche, Martine Dumont, Soo Hwang Teo, Cheng Har Yip, Char-Hong Ng, Eranga Nishanthie Vithana, Vessela Kristensen, Wei Zheng, Sandra Deming-Halverson, Martha Shrubsole, Jirong Long, Robert Winqvist, Katri Pylkäs, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Mervi Grip, Irene L. Andrulis, Julia A. Knight, Gord Glendon, Anna Marie Mulligan, Peter Devilee, Caroline Seynaeve, Montserrat García-Closas, Jonine Figueroa, Stephen J. Chanock, Jolanta Lissowska, Kamila Czene, Daniel Klevebring, Nils Schoof, Maartje J. Hooning, John W. M. Martens, J. Margriet Collée, Madeleine Tilanus-Linthorst, Per Hall, Jingmei Li, Jianjun Liu, Keith Humphreys, Xiao-Ou Shu, Wei Lu, Yu-Tang Gao, Hui Cai, Angela Cox, Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian, William Blot, Lisa B. Signorello, Qiuyin Cai, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Catherine S. Healey, Mitul Shah, Karen A. Pooley, Daehee Kang, Keun-Young Yoo, Dong-Young Noh, Mikael Hartman, Hui Miao, Jen-Hwei Sng, Xueling Sim, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna Durda, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Valerie Gaborieau, James McKay, Amanda E. Toland, Christine B. Ambrosone, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Andrew K. Godwin, Chen-Yang Shen, Chia-Ni Hsiung, Pei-Ei Wu, Shou-Tung Chen, Anthony Swerdlow, Alan Ashworth, Nick Orr, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Bruce A. J. Ponder, Heli Nevanlinna, Melissa A. Brown, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton, Alison M. Dunning

Date Published: 1st Apr 2013

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BRCA1-associated breast and ovarian cancer risks can be modified by common genetic variants. To identify further cancer risk-modifying loci, we performed a multi-stage GWAS of 11,705 BRCA1 carriers (of whom 5,920 were diagnosed with breast and 1,839 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer), with a further replication in an additional sample of 2,646 BRCA1 carriers. We identified a novel breast cancer risk modifier locus at 1q32 for BRCA1 carriers (rs2290854, P = 2.7 \times 10(-8), HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). In addition, we identified two novel ovarian cancer risk modifier loci: 17q21.31 (rs17631303, P = 1.4 \times 10(-8), HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38) and 4q32.3 (rs4691139, P = 3.4 \times 10(-8), HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38). The 4q32.3 locus was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in the general population or BRCA2 carriers, suggesting a BRCA1-specific association. The 17q21.31 locus was also associated with ovarian cancer risk in 8,211 BRCA2 carriers (P = 2\times10(-4)). These loci may lead to an improved understanding of the etiology of breast and ovarian tumors in BRCA1 carriers. Based on the joint distribution of the known BRCA1 breast cancer risk-modifying loci, we estimated that the breast cancer lifetime risks for the 5% of BRCA1 carriers at lowest risk are 28%-50% compared to 81%-100% for the 5% at highest risk. Similarly, based on the known ovarian cancer risk-modifying loci, the 5% of BRCA1 carriers at lowest risk have an estimated lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer of 28% or lower, whereas the 5% at highest risk will have a risk of 63% or higher. Such differences in risk may have important implications for risk prediction and clinical management for BRCA1 carriers.

Authors: Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Lesley McGuffog, Andrew Lee, Curtis Olswold, Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker, Penny Soucy, Zachary Fredericksen, Daniel Barrowdale, Joe Dennis, Mia M. Gaudet, Ed Dicks, Matthew Kosel, Sue Healey, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Adam Lee, François Bacot, Daniel Vincent, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Susan Peock, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Anna Jakubowska, Paolo Radice, Rita Katharina Schmutzler, Susan M. Domchek, Marion Piedmonte, Christian F. Singer, Eitan Friedman, Mads Thomassen, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Susan L. Neuhausen, Csilla I. Szabo, Ignacio Blanco, Mark H. Greene, Beth Y. Karlan, Judy Garber, Catherine M. Phelan, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Marco Montagna, Edith Olah, Irene L. Andrulis, Andrew K. Godwin, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, David E. Goldgar, Trinidad Caldes, Heli Nevanlinna, Ana Osorio, Mary Beth Terry, Mary B. Daly, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Ute Hamann, Susan J. Ramus, Amanda Ewart Toland, Maria A. Caligo, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Nadine Tung, Kathleen Claes, Mary S. Beattie, Melissa C. Southey, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Marc Tischkowitz, Ramunas Janavicius, Esther M. John, Ava Kwong, Orland Diez, Judith Balmaña, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Banu K. Arun, Gad Rennert, Soo-Hwang Teo, Patricia A. Ganz, Ian Campbell, Annemarie H. van der Hout, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, Caroline Seynaeve, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Johannes J. P. Gille, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Marinus J. Blok, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Matti A. Rookus, Peter Devilee, Senno Verhoef, Theo A. M. van Os, Juul T. Wijnen, Debra Frost, Steve Ellis, Elena Fineberg, Radka Platte, D. Gareth Evans, Louise Izatt, Rosalind A. Eeles, Julian Adlard, Diana M. Eccles, Jackie Cook, Carole Brewer, Fiona Douglas, Shirley Hodgson, Patrick J. Morrison, Lucy E. Side, Alan Donaldson, Catherine Houghton, Mark T. Rogers, Huw Dorkins, Jacqueline Eason, Helen Gregory, Emma McCann, Alex Murray, Alain Calender, Agnès Hardouin, Pascaline Berthet, Capucine Delnatte, Catherine Nogues, Christine Lasset, Claude Houdayer, Dominique Leroux, Etienne Rouleau, Fabienne Prieur, Francesca Damiola, Hagay Sobol, Isabelle Coupier, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Laurent Castera, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Mélanie Léoné, Pascal Pujol, Sylvie Mazoyer, Yves-Jean Bignon, Elżbieta Złowocka-Perłowska, Jacek Gronwald, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Durda, Katarzyna Jaworska, Tomasz Huzarski, Amanda B. Spurdle, Alessandra Viel, Bernard Peissel, Bernardo Bonanni, Giulia Melloni, Laura Ottini, Laura Papi, Liliana Varesco, Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Paolo Peterlongo, Sara Volorio, Siranoush Manoukian, Valeria Pensotti, Norbert Arnold, Christoph Engel, Helmut Deissler, Dorothea Gadzicki, Andrea Gehrig, Karin Kast, Kerstin Rhiem, Alfons Meindl, Dieter Niederacher, Nina Ditsch, Hansjoerg Plendl, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Stefanie Engert, Christian Sutter, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Bernhard H. F. Weber, Brita Arver, Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Niklas Loman, Richard Rosenquist, Zakaria Einbeigi, Katherine L. Nathanson, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Stephanie V. Blank, David E. Cohn, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Laurie Small, Michael Friedlander, Victoria L. Bae-Jump, Anneliese Fink-Retter, Christine Rappaport, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Georg Pfeiler, Muy-Kheng Tea, Noralane M. Lindor, Bella Kaufman, Shani Shimon Paluch, Yael Laitman, Anne-Bine Skytte, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Sanne Traasdahl Moeller, Torben A. Kruse, Uffe Birk Jensen, Joseph Vijai, Kara Sarrel, Mark Robson, Noah Kauff, Anna Marie Mulligan, Gord Glendon, Hilmi Ozcelik, Bent Ejlertsen, Finn C. Nielsen, Lars Jønson, Mette K. Andersen, Yuan Chun Ding, Linda Steele, Lenka Foretova, Alex Teulé, Conxi Lazaro, Joan Brunet, Miquel Angel Pujana, Phuong L. Mai, Jennifer T. Loud, Christine Walsh, Jenny Lester, Sandra Orsulic, Steven A. Narod, Josef Herzog, Sharon R. Sand, Silvia Tognazzo, Simona Agata, Tibor Vaszko, JoEllen Weaver, Alexandra V. Stavropoulou, Saundra S. Buys, Atocha Romero, Miguel de La Hoya, Kristiina Aittomäki, Taru A. Muranen, Mercedes Duran, Wendy K. Chung, Adriana Lasa, Cecilia M. Dorfling, Alexander Miron, Javier Benitez, Leigha Senter, Dezheng Huo, Salina B. Chan, Anna P. Sokolenko, Jocelyne Chiquette, Laima Tihomirova, Tara M. Friebel, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Karen H. Lu, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Paul A. James, Per Hall, Alison M. Dunning, Daniel Tessier, Julie Cunningham, Susan L. Slager, Chen Wang, Steven Hart, Kristen Stevens, Jacques Simard, Tomi Pastinen, Vernon S. Pankratz, Kenneth Offit, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou

Date Published: 27th Mar 2013

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

INTRODUCTION: The optimal nutritional strategy remains controversial, particularly in severely septic patients. Our aim was to analyze the effect of three nutritional strategies--enteral (EN), parenteral (PN), and combined nutrition (EN+PN)--on the outcome of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This secondary analysis of the prospective, randomized-controlled, multicenter "Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis (VISEP)" trial only included patients with a length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) of more than 7 days. Besides patient characteristics, data on nutrition therapy were collected daily for up to 21 days. Morbidity as measured by the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, incidence of secondary infections, renal replacement therapy, ventilator-free days and severe hypoglycemia, length of ICU stay, and mortality at 90 days were compared between the three nutritional strategies. RESULTS: In all, 353 patients were included in the analysis with the majority (68.5 %) receiving EN+PN, 24.4 % receiving EN, and only 7.1 % receiving PN. Median caloric intake was 918 kcal/day (EN), 1,210 kcal/day (PN), and 1,343 kcal/day (EN+PN; p < 0.001). In the latter group, calories were predominantly administered via the parenteral route within the first week. The rate of death at 90 days was lower with EN than with EN+PN (26.7 % vs. 41.3 %, p = 0.048), as was the rate of secondary infections, renal replacement therapy, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, the effect on mortality [hazard ratio (HR)= 1.86, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.16-2.98, p = 0.010] and the rate of secondary infections (HR= 1.89, 95 % CI: 1.27-2.81, p = 0.002) remained different between EN and EN+PN. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and prolonged ICU stay, EN alone was associated with improved clinical outcome compared to EN+PN. This hypothesis-generating result has to be confirmed by a randomized-controlled trial in this specific patient population.

Authors: G. Elke, E. Kuhnt, M. Ragaller, D. Schadler, I. Frerichs, F. M. Brunkhorst, M. Loffler, K. Reinhart, N. Weiler

Date Published: 5th Mar 2013

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: disease by infectious agent

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVES: Persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) experience health-related quality of life (HRQoL) problems greatly differing across Europe, and the European Union (EU) faces deep inequalities in MS management from country to country. Through the establishment of a European MS Register (EUReMS), an effective action is proposed to improve the overall knowledge on MS and support effective intervention programmes at EU and national political level. EUReMS aims to achieve consensus on its mission and vision, to define existing data providers, to develop models driving future MS health policies and research, to develop an information technology (IT) infrastructure for a data set, to develop a European shared governance and to secure providers' data provision into EUReMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EUReMS is meant to build on a minimum set of core data from existing national and regional population-based MS registries and from PwMS' perspectives. EUReMS' main partner is the European MS Platform (EMSP) acting in collaboration with associated and collaborating European partners. RESULTS: EUReMS was launched in July 2011. A Consensus Statement on purposes, vision, mission and strategies was produced in December 2011, and a comprehensive survey on existing MS data collections in Europe has been performed, and the EUReMS data mask is currently being discussed. CONCLUSIONS: EUReMS will represent a tool to provide up to date, comparable and sustainable MS data through an effective and credible register, which will encourage extensive knowledge building of MS, more equitable policies and higher standards in MS treatment and services.

Authors: M. Pugliatti, D. Eskic, T. Mikolcic, D. Pitschnau-Michel, K. M. Myhr, J. Sastre-Garriga, S. Otero, L. Wieczynska, C. Torje, E. Holloway, O. Rienhoff, T. Friede, K. Buckow, D. Ellenberger, J. Hillert, A. Glaser, P. Flachenecker, J. Fuge, T. Schyns-Liharska, E. Kasilingam, A. Moretti, C. Thalheim

Date Published: 3rd Jan 2013

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: dementia, Alzheimer's disease

Abstract (Expand)

The relevance of many BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to breast cancer has not been determined due to limited genetic information from families carrying these alterations. Here, we classified six new variants as pathogenic or nonpathogenic by analysis of genetic information from families carrying 64 individual BRCA2 DNA binding domain (DBD) missense mutations using a multifactorial likelihood model of cancer causality. Next, we evaluated the use of a homology-directed DNA break repair (HDR) functional assay as a method for inferring the clinical relevance of VUS in the DBD of BRCA2 using 18 established nonpathogenic missense variants and all 13 established pathogenic missense mutations from the BRCA2 DBD. Compared with the known status of these variants based on the multifactorial likelihood model, the sensitivity of the HDR assay for pathogenic mutations was estimated at 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 75.3%-100%] and specificity was estimated at 100% (95% CI: 81.5%-100%). A statistical classifier for predicting the probability of pathogenicity of BRCA2 DBD variants was developed using these functional results. When applied to 33 additional VUS, the classifier identified eight with 99% or more probability of nonpathogenicity and 18 with 99% or more probability of pathogenicity. Thus, in the absence of genetic evidence, a cell-based HDR assay can provide a probability of pathogenicity for all VUS in the BRCA2 DBD, suggesting that the assay can be used in combination with other information to determine the cancer relevance of BRCA2 VUS.

Authors: Lucia Guidugli, Vernon S. Pankratz, Namit Singh, James Thompson, Catherine A. Erding, Christoph Engel, Rita Schmutzler, Susan Domchek, Katherine Nathanson, Paolo Radice, Christian Singer, Patricia N. Tonin, Noralane M. Lindor, David E. Goldgar, Fergus J. Couch

Date Published: 2nd Jan 2013

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND Mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is affected by multiple variables. The possible impact of the mode of ventilation has not yet been clarified; therefore, a secondary analysiss of the \textquotedblepidemiology of sepsis in Germany\textquotedbl study was performed. The aims were (1) to describe the ventilation strategies currently applied in clinical practice, (2) to analyze the association of the different modes of ventilation with mortality and (3) to investigate whether the ratio between arterial partial pressure of oxygen and inspired fraction of oxygen (PF ratio) and/or other respiratory variables are associated with mortality in septic patients needing ventilatory support. METHODS A total of 454 ICUs in 310 randomly selected hospitals participated in this national prospective observational 1-day point prevalence of sepsis study including 415 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock according to the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine criteria. RESULTS Of the 415 patients, 331 required ventilatory support. Pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) was the most frequently used ventilatory mode (70.6 %) followed by assisted ventilation (AV 21.7 %) and volume controlled ventilation (VCV 7.7 %). Hospital mortality did not differ significantly among patients ventilated with PCV (57 %), VCV (71 %) or AV (51 %, p=0.23). A PF ratio equal or less than 300 mmHg was found in 83.2 % of invasively ventilated patients (n=316). In AV patients there was a clear trend to a higher PF ratio (204\pm70 mmHg) than in controlled ventilated patients (PCV 179\pm74 mmHg, VCV 175\pm75 mmHg, p=0.0551). Multiple regression analysis identified the tidal volume to pressure ratio (tidal volume divided by peak inspiratory airway pressure, odds ratio OR=0.94, 95 % confidence interval 95% CI=0.89-0.99), acute renal failure (OR=2.15, 95% CI=1.01-4.55) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR=1.09, 95% CI=1.03-1.15) but not the PF ratio (univariate analysis OR=0.998, 95 % CI=0.995-1.001) as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS This representative survey revealed that severe sepsis or septic shock was frequently associated with acute lung injury. Different ventilatory modes did not affect mortality. The tidal volume to inspiratory pressure ratio but not the PF ratio was independently associated with mortality.

Authors: D. Schädler, G. Elke, C. Engel, H. Bogatsch, I. Frerichs, R. Kuhlen, R. Rossaint, M. Quintel, J. Scholz, F. M. Brunkhorst, M. Loeffler, K. Reinhart, N. Weiler

Date Published: 2013

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: disease by infectious agent

Abstract (Expand)

PURPOSE: Patients with Lynch syndrome are at high risk for colon and endometrial cancer, but also at an elevated risk for other less common cancers. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to provide risk estimates for these less common cancers in proven carriers of pathogenic mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from the German and Dutch national Lynch syndrome registries. Seven different cancer types were analyzed: stomach, small bowel, urinary bladder, other urothelial, breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. Age-, sex- and MMR gene-specific cumulative risks (CRs) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Sex-specific incidence rates were compared with general population incidence rates by calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the impact of sex and mutated gene on cancer risk. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 2,118 MMR gene mutation carriers (MLH1, n = 806; MSH2, n = 1,004; MSH6, n = 308). All cancers were significantly more frequent than in the general population. The highest risks were found for male small bowel cancer (SIR, 251; 95% CI, 177 to 346; CR at 70 years, 12.0; 95% CI, 5.7 to 18.2). Breast cancer showed an SIR of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.4) and a CR of 14.4 (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.3). MSH2 mutation carriers had a considerably higher risk of developing urothelial cancer than MLH1 or MSH6 carriers. CONCLUSION: The sex- and gene-specific differences of less common cancer risks should be taken into account in cancer surveillance and prevention programs for patients with Lynch syndrome.

Authors: C. Engel, M. Loeffler, V. Steinke, N. Rahner, E. Holinski-Feder, W. Dietmaier, H. K. Schackert, H. Goergens, M. von Knebel Doeberitz, T. O. Goecke, W. Schmiegel, R. Buettner, G. Moeslein, T. G. Letteboer, E. Gomez Garcia, F. J. Hes, N. Hoogerbrugge, F. H. Menko, T. A. van Os, R. H. Sijmons, A. Wagner, I. Kluijt, P. Propping, H. F. Vasen

Date Published: 10th Dec 2012

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: colon cancer

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies