Filter and export

Publications

959 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 959
Multiple meningioma with different grades of malignancy: case report with genetic analysis applying single-nucleotide polymorphism array and classical cytogenetics
Genetical Statistics and Systems Biology

Abstract (Expand)

Multiple meningiomas with synchronous tumor lesions represent only 1-9% of all meningiomas and usually show a uniform histology. The simultaneous occurrence of different grades of malignancy in these … nodules is observed in only one third of multiple meningiomas. We report a case of a sporadic multiple meningioma presenting with different histopathological grades (WHO I and II). The tumor genome of both nodules was analyzed by GTG-banding, spectral karyotyping (SKY), locus-specific FISH, and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A) karyotyping. GTG-banding and SKY revealed 25 structural and 33 numerical aberrations with a slightly increased aberration frequency in the WHO grade II nodule. We could confirm terminal deletions on chromosomes 1p [ish del(1)(p36)(p58-,pter-) 16.5% WHO grade I and 20.9% WHO grade II], partial deletions on 22q, and/or monosomy 22 (monosomy 22 14% WHO grade I and 34% WHO grade II) as the most frequent aberrations in both meningioma nodules. In the meningioma WHO grade II, in addition, a de novo paracentric inversion within chromosomal band 1p36 was detectable. Furthermore, for meningiomas de novo, dicentric chromosomes 4 could be identified in both tumor nodules. We also detected previously published segmental uniparental disomy regions 1p31.1, 6q14.1, 10q21.1, and 14q23.3 in normal control DNA of the patient and in both tumor nodules. Taken together, we describe a very rare case of multiple meningioma with overlapping but also distinct genetic aberration patterns in two nodules of different WHO grades of malignancy.

Authors: Kristin Mocker, Heidrun Holland, Peter Ahnert, Ralf Schober, Manfred Bauer, Holger Kirsten, Ronald Koschny, Jürgen Meixensberger, Wolfgang Krupp

Date Published: 2011

Publication Type: Journal article

Harmonization of growth hormone measurements with different immunoassays by data adjustment
Genetical Statistics and Systems Biology

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND\backslashr\backslashnThe aim of our study was to evaluate the between-assay variability of commercially available immunoassays for the measurement of human growth hormone (hGH). In addition, … we asked whether the comparability of the diagnosis of childhood onset growth hormone deficiency could be improved by adjusting hGH results by statistical methods, such as linear regression, conversion factors, and quantile transformation.\backslashr\backslashnMETHODS\backslashr\backslashnIn archived sera from 312 children and adolescents (age: 17 days-17 years) hGH values between 0.01 and 16.5 ng/mL were determined by using the following immunoassays: AutoDELFIA (PerkinElmer), BC-IRMA (Beckman-Coulter), ELISA (Mediagnost), IMMULITE 2000 (Siemens), iSYS (IDS), Liaison (DiaSorin), UniCel DxI 800 Access (BeckmanCoulter) and {\textquotedblIn house{\textquotedbl-RIA (Tübingen).\backslashr\backslashnRESULTS\backslashr\backslashnThe assays differed in median hGH concentrations by as much as 5.44 ng/mL (Immulite), and as little as 2.67 ng/mL (BC-IRMA). The mean difference between assays ranged from 0.35 to 2.71 ng/mL, whereas several samples displayed differences up to 11.4 ng/mL. The best correlation (r=0.992) was found between AutoDELFIA and Liasion, the lowest (r=0.864) was between an in-house RIA and iSYS. The between-assay CV (mean \pm SD) of values within the cut-off range was 24.3% \pm 7.4%, resulting in an assay-dependent diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in more than 27% of patients. Yet, adjustment of this data by linear regression or a conversion factor reduced the CV below 14%, and the ratio of assay-dependent diagnoses below 8%. Using quantile transformation, the CV and ratio were reduced to 11.4% and \textless1%, respectively.\backslashr\backslashnCONCLUSIONS\backslashr\backslashnhGH measurements using different assays vary significantly. Linear regression, conversion factors, or particularly quantile transformation are useful tools to improve comparability in the diagnostic procedure for the confirmation of GHD in childhood and adolescence.

Authors: Anne Müller, Markus Scholz, Oliver Blankenstein, Gerhard Binder, Roland Pfäffle, Antje Körner, Wieland Kiess, Annegret Heider, Martin Bidlingmaier, Joachim Thiery, Jürgen Kratzsch

Date Published: 2011

Publication Type: Journal article

The 3LGM2-tool to support information management in health care
Management of health information systems

Abstract

Not specified

Author: Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2011

Publication Type: Journal article

Health Information Systems - Architectures and Strategies
Management of health information systems

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Alfred Winter, Reinhold Haux, Elske Ammenwerth, Birgit Brigl, Nils Hellrung, Franziska Jahn

Date Published: 2011

Publication Type: Book

A KPI Framework for Process-based Benchmarking of Hospital Information Systems
Management of health information systems

Abstract (Expand)

Benchmarking is a major topic for monitoring, directing and elucidating the performance of hospital information systems (HIS). Current approaches neglect the outcome of the processes that are supported … by the HIS and their contribution to the hospital’s strategic goals. We suggest to benchmark HIS based on clinical documentation processes and their outcome. A framework consisting of a general process model and outcome criteria for clinical documentation processes is introduced.

Authors: Franziska Jahn, Alfred Winter

Date Published: 2011

Publication Type: InProceedings

Common breast cancer susceptibility alleles and the risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: implications for risk prediction
GC-HBOC - German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

Abstract (Expand)

The known breast cancer susceptibility polymorphisms in FGFR2, TNRC9/TOX3, MAP3K1, LSP1, and 2q35 confer increased risks of breast cancer for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. We evaluated the associations … of 3 additional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs4973768 in SLC4A7/NEK10, rs6504950 in STXBP4/COX11, and rs10941679 at 5p12, and reanalyzed the previous associations using additional carriers in a sample of 12,525 BRCA1 and 7,409 BRCA2 carriers. Additionally, we investigated potential interactions between SNPs and assessed the implications for risk prediction. The minor alleles of rs4973768 and rs10941679 were associated with increased breast cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers (per-allele HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.18, P = 0.006 and HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19, P = 0.03, respectively). Neither SNP was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 carriers, and rs6504950 was not associated with breast cancer for either BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers. Of the 9 polymorphisms investigated, 7 were associated with breast cancer for BRCA2 carriers (FGFR2, TOX3, MAP3K1, LSP1, 2q35, SLC4A7, 5p12, P = 7 \times 10(-11) - 0.03), but only TOX3 and 2q35 were associated with the risk for BRCA1 carriers (P = 0.0049, 0.03, respectively). All risk-associated polymorphisms appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk for mutation carriers. Based on the joint genotype distribution of the 7 risk-associated SNPs in BRCA2 mutation carriers, the 5% of BRCA2 carriers at highest risk (i.e., between 95th and 100th percentiles) were predicted to have a probability between 80% and 96% of developing breast cancer by age 80, compared with 42% to 50% for the 5% of carriers at lowest risk. Our findings indicated that these risk differences might be sufficient to influence the clinical management of mutation carriers.

Authors: Antonis C. Antoniou, Jonathan Beesley, Lesley McGuffog, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Sue Healey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan Chun Ding, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Henry T. Lynch, Claudine Isaacs, Patricia A. Ganz, Gail Tomlinson, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Noralane M. Lindor, Vernon S. Pankratz, Paolo Radice, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Monica Barile, Alessandra Viel, Anna Allavena, Valentina Dall’Olio, Paolo Peterlongo, Csilla I. Szabo, Michal Zikan, Kathleen Claes, Bruce Poppe, Lenka Foretova, Phuong L. Mai, Mark H. Greene, Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Gord Glendon, Hilmi Ozcelik, Irene L. Andrulis, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Lone Sunde, Dorthe Cruger, Uffe Birk Jensen, Maria Caligo, Eitan Friedman, Bella Kaufman, Yael Laitman, Roni Milgrom, Maya Dubrovsky, Shimrit Cohen, Ake Borg, Helena Jernström, Annika Lindblom, Johanna Rantala, Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Beatrice Melin, Kate Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Ania Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Tomasz Huzarski, Ana Osorio, Adriana Lasa, Mercedes Durán, Maria-Isabel Tejada, Javier Godino, Javier Benitez, Ute Hamann, Mieke Kriege, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Rob B. van der Luijt, Christi J. van Asperen, Peter Devilee, E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Marinus J. Blok, Cora M. Aalfs, Frans Hogervorst, Matti Rookus, Margaret Cook, Clare Oliver, Debra Frost, Don Conroy, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Gabriella Pichert, Rosemarie Davidson, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Joan Paterson, Shirley Hodgson, Patrick J. Morrison, Mary E. Porteous, Lisa Walker, M. John Kennedy, Huw Dorkins, Susan Peock, Andrew K. Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Antoine de Pauw, Sylvie Mazoyer, Valérie Bonadona, Christine Lasset, Hélène Dreyfus, Dominique Leroux, Agnès Hardouin, Pascaline Berthet, Laurence Faivre, Catherine Loustalot, Tetsuro Noguchi, Hagay Sobol, Etienne Rouleau, Catherine Nogues, Marc Frénay, Laurence Vénat-Bouvet, John L. Hopper, Mary B. Daly, Mary B. Terry, Esther M. John, Saundra S. Buys, Yosuf Yassin, Alexander Miron, David Goldgar, Christian F. Singer, Anne Catharina Dressler, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Georg Pfeiler, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Lars Jønson, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Tomas Kirchhoff, Kenneth Offit, Vincent Devlin, Ana Dutra-Clarke, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Katie Wakeley, John F. Boggess, Jack Basil, Peter E. Schwartz, Stephanie V. Blank, Amanda Ewart Toland, Marco Montagna, Cinzia Casella, Evgeny Imyanitov, Laima Tihomirova, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Susan J. Ramus, Lara Sucheston, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Gross, Rita Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Magdalena Lochmann, Norbert Arnold, Simone Heidemann, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Helmut Deissler, Dorothea Gadzicki, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Karin Kast, Ines Schönbuchner, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de La Hoya, Kristiina Aittomäki, Heli Nevanlinna, Jacques Simard, Amanda B. Spurdle, Helene Holland, Xiaoqing Chen, Radka Platte, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton

Date Published: 6th Dec 2010

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Immunoblastic morphology but not the immunohistochemical GCB/nonGCB classifier predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the RICOVER-60 trial of the DSHNHL.
GLA - German Lymphoma Alliance

Abstract (Expand)

The survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients varies considerably, reflecting the molecular diversity of tumors. In view of the controversy whether cytologic features, immunohistochemical … markers or gene expression signatures may capture this molecular diversity, we investigated which features provide prognostic information in a prospective trial in the R-CHOP treatment era. Within the cohort of DLBCLs patients treated in the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL), we tested the prognostic impact of IB morphology in 949 patients. The expression of immunohistochemical markers CD5, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR, interferon regulatory factor-4/multiple myeloma-1 (IRF4/MUM1), and Ki-67 was assessed in 506 patients. Expression of the immunohistochemical markers tested was of modest, if any, prognostic relevance. Moreover, the Hans algorithm using the expression patterns of CD10, BCL6, and interferon regulatory factor-4/multiple myeloma-1 failed to show prognostic significance in the entire cohort as well as in patient subgroups. IB morphology, however, emerged as a robust, significantly adverse prognostic factor in multivariate analysis, and its diagnosis showed a good reproducibility among expert hematopathologists. We conclude, therefore, that IB morphology in DLBCL is likely to capture some of the adverse molecular alterations that are currently not detectable in a routine diagnostic setting, and that its recognition has significant prognostic power.

Authors: G. Ott, M. Ziepert, W. Klapper, H. Horn, M. Szczepanowski, H. W. Bernd, C. Thorns, A. C. Feller, D. Lenze, M. Hummel, H. Stein, H. K. Muller-Hermelink, M. Frank, M. L. Hansmann, T. F. Barth, P. Moller, S. Cogliatti, M. Pfreundschuh, N. Schmitz, L. Trumper, M. Loeffler, A. Rosenwald

Date Published: 2nd Dec 2010

Publication Type: Not specified

Human Diseases: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Navigate

Health Atlas - Local Data Hub/Leipzig

The Health Atlas - Local Data Hub/Leipzig is an alliance of medical ontologists, medical systems biologists and clinical trials groups to design and implement a multi-functional and quality-assured atlas. It provides models, data and metadata on specific use cases from medical research fields.

Registered Repository

re3data.org Badge
Powered by
 (v.1.13.0-master)
Health Atlas | Funding and Programmes | Credits | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Imprint
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies