Publications

265 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 265

Abstract (Expand)

PURPOSE: Daytime sleepiness is associated with several medical problems. The aim of this paper is to provide normative values for one of the most often used questionnaires measuring daytime sleepiness, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). METHODS: A large sample of 9711 people from the German general population took part in this study. In addition to the ESS, several other questionnaires were used, and sociodemographic and behavioral factors were recorded. RESULTS: Normative values for the ESS are given. According to the generally accepted criterion ESS > 10, 23 % of the sample showed excessive daytime sleepiness. Males reported significantly more daytime sleepiness than females (effect size d = 0.19). In the age range of 40-80 years, a continuous decline of daytime sleepiness was observed. Psychometric properties of the ESS were good. Alcohol intake and nicotine consumption were marginally associated with daytime sleepiness, and obese people reported significantly more sleepiness than people of normal weight (OR = 1.39). CONCLUSIONS: The normative tables allow clinicians and researchers to assess the degree of their patients' daytime sleepiness, especially in the upper range of scores.

Authors: C. Sander, U. Hegerl, K. Wirkner, N. Walter, R. D. Kocalevent, K. Petrowski, H. Glaesmer, A. Hinz

Date Published: 29th May 2016

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a widespread method for calculating myocardial strains and estimating left ventricle function. Since echocardiographic clips are corrupted by speckle decorrelation noise, resulting in irregular, nonphysiological tissue displacement fields, smoothing is performed on the displacement data, affecting the strain results. Thus, strain results may depend on the specific implementations of 2-D STE, as well as other systems' characteristics of the various vendors. A novel algorithm (called K-SAD) is introduced, which integrates the physiological constraint of smoothness of the displacement field into an optimization process. Simulated B-mode clips, modeling healthy and abnormal cases, were processed by K-SAD. Peak global and subendocardial longitudinal strains, as well as regional strains, were calculated. In addition, 410 healthy subjects were also processed. The results of K-SAD are compared with those of one of the leading commercial product. K-SAD provides global mid-wall strain values, as well as subendocardial and regional strain values, all in good agreement with the ground-truth-simulated phantom data. K-SAD peak global longitudinal systolic strain values for 410 healthy subjects are quite similar for the different regions: - 17.02 +/- 4.02%, - 19.00 +/- 3.45%, and - 19.72 +/- 5.06% at the basal, mid, and apical regions, respectively. Improved performance under noisy conditions was demonstrated by comparing a subgroup of 40 subjects with the best image quality with the remaining 370 cohort: K-SAD provides statistically similar global and regional results for the two cohorts. Our study indicates that the sensitivity of strain values to speckle noise, caused by the post block-matching weighted smoothing, can be significantly reduced and accuracy enhanced by employing an integrated one-stage, physiologically constrained optimization process.

Authors: H. Khamis, S. Shimoni, A. Hagendorff, N. Smirin, Z. Friedman, D. Adam

Date Published: 24th May 2016

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

Negative emotional stimuli are particularly salient events that receive privileged access to neurocognitive resources. At the neural level, the processing of negative stimuli relies on a set of sensory, limbic, and prefrontal areas. However, controversies exist on how demographic and task-related characteristics modulate this brain pattern. Here, we used activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis and replicator dynamics to investigate the processing of negative visual stimuli in healthy adults. Our findings endorse the central role of the amygdala. This result might reflect how this structure modulates perceptual and attentional mechanisms in response to emotional stimuli. Additionally, we characterize how the neural processing of negative visual stimuli is influenced by the demographic factors of age and sex as well as by task-related characteristics like stimulus type, emotion category, and task instruction, with the amygdala showing comparable engagement across different sexes, stimulus types, and task instructions. Our findings practically inform experimentation in the affective neurosciences but also suggest brain circuits for neurobiological investigations of affective symptomatology.

Authors: I. Garcia-Garcia, J. Kube, M. Gaebler, A. Horstmann, A. Villringer, J. Neumann

Date Published: 12th May 2016

Publication Type: Not specified

Abstract (Expand)

Dopamine has been implicated in the regulation of sleep-wake states and the circadian rhythm. However, there is no consensus on the impact of two established dopaminergic gene variants: the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met (COMT Val158Met; rs4680) and the dopamine D4 receptor Exon III variable-number-of-tandem-repeat polymorphism (DRD4 VNTR). Pursuing a multi-method approach, we examined their potential effects on circadian preferences, arousal regulation and sleep. Subjects underwent a 7-day actigraphy assessment (SenseWear Pro3), a 20-minute resting EEG (analyzed using VIGALL 2.0) and a body mass index (BMI) assessment. Further, they completed the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The sample comprised 4625 subjects (19-82 years) genotyped for COMT Val158Met, and 689 elderly subjects (64-82 years) genotyped for DRD4 VNTR. The number of subjects varied across phenotypes. Power calculations revealed a minimum required phenotypic variance explained by genotype ranging between 0.5% and 1.5% for COMT Val158Met and between 3.3% and 6.0% for DRD4 VNTR. Analyses did not reveal significant genotype effects on MEQ, ESS, PSQI, BMI, actigraphy and EEG variables. Additionally, we found no compelling evidence in sex- and age-stratified subsamples. Few associations surpassed the threshold of nominal significance (p < .05), providing some indication for a link between DRD4 VNTR and daytime sleepiness. Taken together, in light of the statistical power obtained in the present study, our data particularly suggest no impact of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism on circadian preferences, arousal regulation and sleep. The suggestive link between DRD4 VNTR and daytime sleepiness, on the other hand, might be worth investigation in a sample enriched with younger adults.

Authors: P. Jawinski, S. Tegelkamp, C. Sander, M. Hantzsch, J. Huang, N. Mauche, M. Scholz, J. Spada, C. Ulke, R. Burkhardt, A. Reif, U. Hegerl, T. Hensch

Date Published: 6th May 2016

Publication Type: Not specified

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVE Clinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3’ UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovariann and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370. METHODS Centralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers). RESULTS We found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p=0.74) or breast cancer (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p=0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p=0.14, breast cancer HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p=0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p=0.34, breast cancer HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p=0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.38), breast cancer (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p=0.38), and all other previously-reported associations. CONCLUSIONS rs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers.

Authors: Antoinette Hollestelle, Frederieke H. van der Baan, Andrew Berchuck, Sharon E. Johnatty, Katja K. Aben, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Kristiina Aittomäki, Elisa Alducci, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia N. Antonenkova, Antonis C. Antoniou, Carmel Apicella, Volker Arndt, Norbert Arnold, Banu K. Arun, Brita Arver, Alan Ashworth, Laura Baglietto, Rosemary Balleine, Elisa V. Bandera, Daniel Barrowdale, Yukie T. Bean, Lars Beckmann, Matthias W. Beckmann, Javier Benitez, Andreas Berger, Raanan Berger, Benoit Beuselinck, Maria Bisogna, Line Bjorge, Carl Blomqvist, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Anders Bojesen, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Bernardo Bonanni, Judith S. Brand, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Louise Brinton, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Fiona Bruinsma, Joan Brunet, Thomas Brüning, Agnieszka Budzilowska, Clareann H. Bunker, Barbara Burwinkel, Ralf Butzow, Saundra S. Buys, Maria A. Caligo, Ian Campbell, Jonathan Carter, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Kathleen B. M. Claes, J. Margriet Collée, Linda S. Cook, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Daniel Cramer, Simon S. Cross, Julie M. Cunningham, Cezary Cybulski, Kamila Czene, Francesca Damiola, Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Hatef Darabi, Miguel de La Hoya, Anna deFazio, Joseph Dennis, Peter Devilee, Ed M. Dicks, Orland Diez, Jennifer A. Doherty, Susan M. Domchek, Cecilia M. Dorfling, Thilo Dörk, Isabel Dos Santos Silva, Andreas Du Bois, Martine Dumont, Alison M. Dunning, Mercedes Duran, Douglas F. Easton, Diana Eccles, Robert P. Edwards, Hans Ehrencrona, Bent Ejlertsen, Arif B. Ekici, Steve D. Ellis, Christoph Engel, Mikael Eriksson, Peter A. Fasching, Lidia Feliubadalo, Jonine Figueroa, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Olivia Fletcher, Annette Fontaine, Stefano Fortuzzi, Florentia Fostira, Brooke L. Fridley, Tara Friebel, Eitan Friedman, Grace Friel, Debra Frost, Judy Garber, Montserrat García-Closas, Simon A. Gayther, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Graham G. Giles, Rosalind Glasspool, Gord Glendon, Andrew K. Godwin, Marc T. Goodman, Martin Gore, Mark H. Greene, Mervi Grip, Jacek Gronwald, Daphne Gschwantler Kaulich, Pascal Guénel, Starr R. Guzman, Lothar Haeberle, Christopher A. Haiman, Per Hall, Sandra L. Halverson, Ute Hamann, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Philipp Harter, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Sue Healey, Alexander Hein, Florian Heitz, Brian E. Henderson, Josef Herzog, Michelle A. T Hildebrandt, Claus K. Høgdall, Estrid Høgdall, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, John L. Hopper, Keith Humphreys, Tomasz Huzarski, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Claudine Isaacs, Anna Jakubowska, Ramunas Janavicius, Katarzyna Jaworska, Allan Jensen, Uffe Birk Jensen, Nichola Johnson, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Maria Kabisch, Beth Y. Karlan, Vesa Kataja, Noah Kauff, Linda E. Kelemen, Michael J. Kerin, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Susanne K. Kjaer, Julia A. Knight, Jacoba P. Knol-Bout, Irene Konstantopoulou, Veli-Matti Kosma, Camilla Krakstad, Vessela Kristensen, Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker, Jolanta Kupryjanczyk, Yael Laitman, Diether Lambrechts, Sandrina Lambrechts, Melissa C. Larson, Adriana Lasa, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Conxi Lazaro, Nhu D. Le, Loic Le Marchand, Arto Leminen, Jenny Lester, Douglas A. Levine, Jingmei Li, Dong Liang, Annika Lindblom, Noralane Lindor, Jolanta Lissowska, Jirong Long, Karen H. Lu, Jan Lubinski, Lene Lundvall, Galina Lurie, Phuong L. Mai, Arto Mannermaa, Sara Margolin, Frederique Mariette, Frederik Marme, John W. M. Martens, Leon F. A. G. Massuger, Christine Maugard, Sylvie Mazoyer, Lesley McGuffog, Valerie McGuire, Catriona McLean, Iain McNeish, Alfons Meindl, Florence Menegaux, Primitiva Menéndez, Janusz Menkiszak, Usha Menon, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Nicola Miller, Roger L. Milne, Francesmary Modugno, Marco Montagna, Kirsten B. Moysich, Heiko Müller, Anna Marie Mulligan, Taru A. Muranen, Steven A. Narod, Katherine L. Nathanson, Roberta B. Ness, Susan L. Neuhausen, Heli Nevanlinna, Patrick Neven, Finn C. Nielsen, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Robert L. Nussbaum, Kunle Odunsi, Kenneth Offit, Edith Olah, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Janet E. Olson, Sara H. Olson, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Irene Orlow, Nick Orr, Sandra Orsulic, Ana Osorio, Laura Ottini, James Paul, Celeste L. Pearce, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Bernard Peissel, Tanja Pejovic, Liisa M. Pelttari, Jo Perkins, Jenny Permuth-Wey, Paolo Peterlongo, Julian Peto, Catherine M. Phelan, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Marion Piedmonte, Malcolm C. Pike, Radka Platte, Joanna Plisiecka-Halasa, Elizabeth M. Poole, Bruce Poppe, Katri Pylkäs, Paolo Radice, Susan J. Ramus, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Malcolm W. R. Reed, Gad Rennert, Harvey A. Risch, Mark Robson, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Atocha Romero, Mary Anne Rossing, Joseph H. Rothstein, Anja Rudolph, Ingo Runnebaum, Ritu Salani, Helga B. Salvesen, Elinor J. Sawyer, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Rita K. Schmutzler, Andreas Schneeweiss, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Michael G. Schrauder, Fredrick Schumacher, Ira Schwaab, Giulietta Scuvera, Thomas A. Sellers, Gianluca Severi, Caroline M. Seynaeve, Mitul Shah, Martha Shrubsole, Nadeem Siddiqui, Weiva Sieh, Jacques Simard, Christian F. Singer, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Dominiek Smeets, Christof Sohn, Maria Soller, Honglin Song, Penny Soucy, Melissa C. Southey, Christa Stegmaier, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Lara Sucheston, Anthony Swerdlow, Ingvild L. Tangen, Muy-Kheng Tea, Manuel R. Teixeira, Kathryn L. Terry, Mary Beth Terry, Mads Thomassen, Pamela J. Thompson, Laima Tihomirova, Marc Tischkowitz, Amanda Ewart Toland, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Ian Tomlinson, Diana Torres, Thérèse Truong, Helen Tsimiklis, Nadine Tung, Shelley S. Tworoger, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Celine M. Vachon, Laura J. van ’t Veer, Anne M. van Altena, C. J. van Asperen, David van den Berg, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Helena C. van Doorn, Els van Nieuwenhuysen, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Ignace Vergote, Senno Verhoef, Robert A. Vierkant, Joseph Vijai, Allison F. Vitonis, Anna von Wachenfeldt, Christine Walsh, Qin Wang, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Maren Weischer, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Caroline Weltens, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S. Whittemore, Lynne R. Wilkens, Robert Winqvist, Anna H. Wu, Xifeng Wu, Hannah P. Yang, Daniela Zaffaroni, M. Pilar Zamora, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Matti A. Rookus, Maartje J. Hooning, Ellen L. Goode

Date Published: 1st May 2016

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

The genetic basis of sleep is still poorly understood. Despite the moderate to high heritability of sleep-related phenotypes, known genetic variants explain only a small proportion of the phenotypical variance. However, most previous studies were based solely upon self-report measures. The present study aimed to conduct the first genome-wide association (GWA) of actigraphic sleep phenotypes. The analyses included 956 middle- to older-aged subjects (40-79 years) from the LIFE Adult Study. The SenseWear Pro 3 Armband was used to collect 11 actigraphic parameters of night- and daytime sleep and three parameters of rest (lying down). The parameters comprised measures of sleep timing, quantity and quality. A total of 7 141 204 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analysed after imputation and quality control. We identified several variants below the significance threshold of P </= 5x 10(-8) (not corrected for analysis of multiple traits). The most significant was a hit near UFL1 associated with sleep efficiency on weekdays (P = 1.39 x 10(-8) ). Further SNPs were close to significance, including an association between sleep latency and a variant in CSNK2A1 (P = 8.20 x 10(-8) ), a gene known to be involved in the regulation of circadian rhythm. In summary, our GWAS identified novel candidate genes with biological plausibility being promising candidates for replication and further follow-up studies.

Authors: J. Spada, M. Scholz, H. Kirsten, T. Hensch, K. Horn, P. Jawinski, C. Ulke, R. Burkhardt, K. Wirkner, M. Loeffler, U. Hegerl, C. Sander

Date Published: 30th Apr 2016

Publication Type: Journal article

Abstract (Expand)

OBJECTIVES: even though a great number of research studies have shown that high education has protective effects against dementia, some studies did not observe such a significant effect. In that respect, the aim of our study was to investigate and compare various operationalisation approaches of education and how they impact dementia risk within one sample. METHODS: data were derived from the Leipzig longitudinal study of the aged (LEILA75+). Individuals aged 75 and older underwent six cognitive assessments at an interval of 1.5 years and a final follow-up 15 years after the baseline assessment. We operationalised education according to different approaches used in previous studies and analysed the impact on dementia incidence via multivariate cox regression modelling. RESULTS: the results showed that whether education is identified as significant protector against dementia strongly depends on the operationalisation of education. Whereas the pure number of years of education showed statistically significant protective effects on dementia risk, other more complex categorical classification approaches did not. Moreover, completing >10 years of education or a tertiary level seems to be an important threshold to significantly reduce dementia risk. CONCLUSION: findings suggest a protective effect of more years of education on a lower dementia risk with a particular critical threshold of completing >10 years of education. Further, the findings highlight that, when examining risks and protective factors of dementia, a careful consideration of the underlying definitions and operationalisation approaches is required.

Authors: F. S. Then, T. Luck, M. C. Angermeyer, S. G. Riedel-Heller

Date Published: 9th Apr 2016

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: dementia

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies