Publications

37 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 37

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND Conventional anthropometric measurements are time consuming and require well trained medical staff. To use three-dimensional whole body laser scanning in daily clinical work, validity, andd reliability have to be confirmed. METHODS We compared a whole body laser scanner with conventional anthropometry in a group of 473 children and adolescents from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE-Child). Concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were calculated separately for sex, weight, and age to assess validity. Overall CCC (OCCC) was used to analyze intraobserver reliability. RESULTS Body height and the circumferences of waist, hip, upper arm, and calf had an \textquotedblexcellent\textquotedbl (CCC ≥0.9); neck and thigh circumference, a \textquotedblgood\textquotedbl (CCC ≥0.7); and head circumference, a \textquotedbllow\textquotedbl (CCC \textless 0.5) degree of concordance over the complete study population. We observed dependencies of validity on sex, weight, and age. Intraobserver reliability of both techniques is \textquotedblexcellent\textquotedbl (OCCC ≥0.9). CONCLUSION Scanning is faster, requires less intensive staff training and provides more information. It can be used in an epidemiologic setting with children and adolescents but some measurements should be considered with caution due to reduced agreement with conventional anthropometry.

Authors: Fabian Glock, Mandy Vogel, Stephanie Naumann, Andreas Kuehnapfel, Markus Scholz, Andreas Hiemisch, Toralf Kirsten, Kristin Rieger, Antje Koerner, Markus Loeffler, Wieland Kiess

Date Published: 1st May 2017

Publication Type: Journal article

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies