Publications

96 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 96

Abstract (Expand)

Objectives: Potential opportunities and challenges of predictive genetic risk classification of healthy persons are currently discussed. However, the budgetary impact of rising demand is uncertain. This project aims to evaluate budgetary consequences of predictive genetic risk classification for statutory health insurance in Germany. Methods: A Markov model was developed in the form of a cohort simulation. It analyzes a population of female relatives of hereditary breast cancer patients. Mutation carriers are offered intensified screening, women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation can decide on prophylactic mastectomy and/or ovarectomy. The model considers the following scenarios: (a) steady demand for predictive genetic testing, and (b) rising demand. Most input parameters are based on data of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. The model contains 49 health states, starts in 2015, and runs for 10 years. Prices were evaluated from the perspective of statutory health insurance. Results: Steady demand leads to an expenditure of \text€49.8 million during the 10-year period. Rising demands lead to additional expenses of \text€125.5 million. The model reveals the genetic analysis to be the main cost driver while cost savings in treatment costs of breast and ovarian cancer are indicated. Conclusions: The results contribute to close the knowledge gap concerning the budgetary consequences due to genetic risk classification. A rising demand leads to additional costs especially due to costs for genetic analysis. The model indicates budget shifts with cost savings due to breast and ovarian cancer treatment in the scenario of rising demands.

Authors: Silke Neusser, Beate Lux, Cordula Barth, Kathrin Pahmeier, Kerstin Rhiem, Rita Schmutzler, Christoph Engel, Jürgen Wasem, Stefan Huster, Peter Dabrock, Anja Neumann

Date Published: 2nd Dec 2019

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND The role of the BARD1 gene in breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition remains elusive, as published case-control investigations have revealed controversial results. We aimedd to assess the role of deleterious BARD1 germline variants in BC/OC predisposition in a sample of 4920 BRCA1/2-negative female BC/OC index patients of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC). METHODS A total of 4469 female index patients with BC, 451 index patients with OC, and 2767 geographically matched female control individuals were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging rare missense variants in BARD1. All patients met the inclusion criteria of the GC-HBOC for germline testing and reported at least one relative with BC or OC. Additional control datasets (Exome Aggregation Consortium, ExAC; Fabulous Ladies Over Seventy, FLOSSIES) were included for the calculation of odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS We identified LoF variants in 23 of 4469 BC index patients (0.51%) and in 36 of 37,265 control individuals (0.10%), resulting in an OR of 5.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.17-9.04; P \textless 0.00001). BARD1-mutated BC index patients showed a significantly younger mean age at first diagnosis (AAD; 42.3 years, range 24-60 years) compared with the overall study sample (48.6 years, range 17-92 years; P = 0.00347). In the subgroup of BC index patients with an AAD \textless 40 years, an OR of 12.04 (95% CI = 5.78-25.08; P \textless 0.00001) was observed. An OR of 7.43 (95% CI = 4.26-12.98; P \textless 0.00001) was observed when stratified for an AAD \textless 50 years. LoF variants in BARD1 were not significantly associated with BC in the subgroup of index patients with an AAD ≥ 50 years (OR = 2.29; 95% CI = 0.82-6.45; P = 0.11217). Overall, rare and predicted damaging BARD1 missense variants were significantly more prevalent in BC index patients compared with control individuals (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.26-3.67; P = 0.00723). Neither LoF variants nor predicted damaging rare missense variants in BARD1 were identified in 451 familial index patients with OC. CONCLUSIONS Due to the significant association of germline LoF variants in BARD1 with early-onset BC, we suggest that intensified BC surveillance programs should be offered to women carrying pathogenic BARD1 gene variants.

Authors: Nana Weber-Lassalle, Julika Borde, Konstantin Weber-Lassalle, Judit Horváth, Dieter Niederacher, Norbert Arnold, Silke Kaulfuß, Corinna Ernst, Victoria G. Paul, Ellen Honisch, Kristina Klaschik, Alexander E. Volk, Christian Kubisch, Steffen Rapp, Nadine Lichey, Janine Altmüller, Louisa Lepkes, Esther Pohl-Rescigno, Holger Thiele, Peter Nürnberg, Mirjam Larsen, Lisa Richters, Kerstin Rhiem, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Rita K. Schmutzler, Eric Hahnen, Jan Hauke

Date Published: 1st Dec 2019

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 170 breast cancer susceptibility loci. Here we hypothesize that some risk-associated variants might act in non-breast tissues, specifically adipose tissue and immune cells from blood and spleen. Using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) reported in these tissues, we identify 26 previously unreported, likely target genes of overall breast cancer risk variants, and 17 for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, several with a known immune function. We determine the directional effect of gene expression on disease risk measured based on single and multiple eQTL. In addition, using a gene-based test of association that considers eQTL from multiple tissues, we identify seven (and four) regions with variants associated with overall (and ER-negative) breast cancer risk, which were not reported in previous GWAS. Further investigation of the function of the implicated genes in breast and immune cells may provide insights into the etiology of breast cancer.

Authors: Manuel A. Ferreira, Eric R. Gamazon, Fares Al-Ejeh, Kristiina Aittomäki, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Adalgeir Arason, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Banu K. Arun, Ella Asseryanis, Jacopo Azzollini, Judith Balmaña, Daniel R. Barnes, Daniel Barrowdale, Matthias W. Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Javier Benitez, Marina Bermisheva, Katarzyna Białkowska, Carl Blomqvist, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Ake Borg, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Annegien Broeks, Barbara Burwinkel, Trinidad Caldés, Maria A. Caligo, Daniele Campa, Ian Campbell, Federico Canzian, Jonathan Carter, Brian D. Carter, Jose E. Castelao, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Hans Christiansen, Wendy K. Chung, Kathleen B. M. Claes, Christine L. Clarke, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Miguel de La Hoya, Joe Dennis, Peter Devilee, Orland Diez, Thilo Dörk, Alison M. Dunning, Miriam Dwek, Diana M. Eccles, Bent Ejlertsen, Carolina Ellberg, Christoph Engel, Mikael Eriksson, Peter A. Fasching, Olivia Fletcher, Henrik Flyger, Eitan Friedman, Debra Frost, Marike Gabrielson, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Patricia A. Ganz, Susan M. Gapstur, Judy Garber, Montserrat García-Closas, José A. García-Sáenz, Mia M. Gaudet, Graham G. Giles, Gord Glendon, Andrew K. Godwin, Mark S. Goldberg, David E. Goldgar, Anna González-Neira, Mark H. Greene, Jacek Gronwald, Pascal Guénel, Christopher A. Haiman, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Wei He, Jane Heyworth, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Antoinette Hollestelle, Robert N. Hoover, John L. Hopper, Peter J. Hulick, Keith Humphreys, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Claudine Isaacs, Milena Jakimovska, Anna Jakubowska, Paul A. James, Ramunas Janavicius, Rachel C. Jankowitz, Esther M. John, Nichola Johnson, Vijai Joseph, Beth Y. Karlan, Elza Khusnutdinova, Johanna I. Kiiski, Yon-Dschun Ko, Michael E. Jones, Irene Konstantopoulou, Vessela N. Kristensen, Yael Laitman, Diether Lambrechts, Conxi Lazaro, Goska Leslie, Jenny Lester, Fabienne Lesueur, Sara Lindström, Jirong Long, Jennifer T. Loud, Jan Lubiński, Enes Makalic, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Sara Margolin, Tabea Maurer, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Lesley McGuffog, Alfons Meindl, Usha Menon, Kyriaki Michailidou, Austin Miller, Marco Montagna, Fernando Moreno, Lidia Moserle, Anna Marie Mulligan, Katherine L. Nathanson, Susan L. Neuhausen, Heli Nevanlinna, Ines Nevelsteen, Finn C. Nielsen, Liene Nikitina-Zake, Robert L. Nussbaum, Kenneth Offit, Edith Olah, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Håkan Olsson, Ana Osorio, Janos Papp, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Michael T. Parsons, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Ana Peixoto, Paolo Peterlongo, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Bruce Poppe, Nadege Presneau, Paolo Radice, Johanna Rantala, Gad Rennert, Harvey A. Risch, Emmanouil Saloustros, Kristin Sanden, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Rita K. Schmutzler, Priyanka Sharma, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jacques Simard, Christian F. Singer, Penny Soucy, Melissa C. Southey, John J. Spinelli, Amanda B. Spurdle, Jennifer Stone, Anthony J. Swerdlow, William J. Tapper, Jack A. Taylor, Manuel R. Teixeira, Mary Beth Terry, Alex Teulé, Mads Thomassen, Kathrin Thöne, Darcy L. Thull, Marc Tischkowitz, Amanda E. Toland, Diana Torres, Thérèse Truong, Nadine Tung, Celine M. Vachon, Christi J. van Asperen, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Ana Vega, Alessandra Viel, Qin Wang, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Camilla Wendt, Robert Winqvist, Xiaohong R. Yang, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Argyrios Ziogas, Peter Kraft, Antonis C. Antoniou, Wei Zheng, Douglas F. Easton, Roger L. Milne, Jonathan Beesley, Georgia Chenevix-Trench

Date Published: 1st Dec 2019

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

Pathogenic sequence variants (PSV) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk and severity of prostate cancer (PCa). We evaluated whether PSVs in BRCA1/2 were associated with risk of overall PCa or high grade (Gleason 8+) PCa using an international sample of 65 BRCA1 and 171 BRCA2 male PSV carriers with PCa, and 3,388 BRCA1 and 2,880 BRCA2 male PSV carriers without PCa. PSVs in the 3’ region of BRCA2 (c.7914+) were significantly associated with elevated risk of PCa compared with reference bin c.1001-c.7913 (HR=1.78, 95%CI: 1.25-2.52, p=0.001), as well as elevated risk of Gleason 8+ PCa (HR=3.11, 95%CI: 1.63-5.95, p=0.001). c.756-c.1000 was also associated with elevated PCa risk (HR=2.83, 95%CI: 1.71-4.68, p=0.00004) and elevated risk of Gleason 8+ PCa (HR=4.95, 95%CI: 2.12-11.54, p=0.0002). No genotype-phenotype associations were detected for PSVs in BRCA1. These results demonstrate that specific BRCA2 PSVs may be associated with elevated risk of developing aggressive PCa.

Authors: Vivek L. Patel, Evan L. Busch, Tara M. Friebel, Angel Cronin, Goska Leslie, Lesley McGuffog, Julian Adlard, Simona Agata, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Munaza Ahmed, Kristiina Aittomäki, Elisa Alducci, Irene L. Andrulis, Adalgeir Arason, Norbert Arnold, Grazia Artioli, Brita Arver, Bernd Auber, Jacopo Azzollini, Judith Balmaña, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Daniel R. Barnes, Alicia Barroso, Daniel Barrowdale, Muriel Belotti, Javier Benitez, Brigitte Bertelsen, Marinus J. Blok, Istvan Bodrogi, Valérie Bonadona, Bernardo Bonanni, Davide Bondavalli, Susanne E. Boonen, Julika Borde, Ake Borg, Angela R. Bradbury, Angela Brady, Carole Brewer, Joan Brunet, Bruno Buecher, Saundra S. Buys, Santiago Cabezas-Camarero, Trinidad Caldés, Almuth Caliebe, Maria A. Caligo, Mariarosaria Calvello, Ian G. Campbell, Ileana Carnevali, Estela Carrasco, Tsun L. Chan, Annie T. W. Chu, Wendy K. Chung, Kathleen B. M. Claes, Gemo Study Collaborators, Embrace Collaborators, Jackie Cook, Laura Cortesi, Fergus J. Couch, Mary B. Daly, Giuseppe Damante, Esther Darder, Rosemarie Davidson, Miguel de La Hoya, Lara Della Puppa, Joe Dennis, Orland Díez, Yuan Chun Ding, Nina Ditsch, Susan M. Domchek, Alan Donaldson, Bernd Dworniczak, Douglas F. Easton, Diana M. Eccles, Rosalind A. Eeles, Hans Ehrencrona, Bent Ejlertsen, Christoph Engel, D. Gareth Evans, Laurence Faivre, Ulrike Faust, Lídia Feliubadaló, Lenka Foretova, Florentia Fostira, George Fountzilas, Debra Frost, Vanesa García-Barberán, Pilar Garre, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Lajos Géczi, Andrea Gehrig, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Paul Gesta, Giuseppe Giannini, Gord Glendon, Andrew K. Godwin, David E. Goldgar, Mark H. Greene, Angelica M. Gutierrez-Barrera, Eric Hahnen, Ute Hamann, Jan Hauke, Natalie Herold, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Ellen Honisch, John L. Hopper, Peter J. Hulick, Kconfab Investigators, Hebon Investigators, Louise Izatt, Agnes Jager, Paul James, Ramunas Janavicius, Uffe Birk Jensen, Thomas Dyrso Jensen, Oskar Th Johannsson, Esther M. John, Vijai Joseph, Eunyoung Kang, Karin Kast, Johanna I. Kiiski, Sung-Won Kim, Zisun Kim, Kwang-Pil Ko, Irene Konstantopoulou, Gero Kramer, Lotte Krogh, Torben A. Kruse, Ava Kwong, Mirjam Larsen, Christine Lasset, Charlotte Lautrup, Conxi Lázaro, Jihyoun Lee, Jong Won Lee, Min Hyuk Lee, Johannes Lemke, Fabienne Lesueur, Annelie Liljegren, Annika Lindblom, Patricia Llovet, Adria Lopez-Fernández, Irene Lopez-Perolio, Victor Lorca, Jennifer T. Loud, Edmond S. K. Ma, Phuong L. Mai, Siranoush Manoukian, Veronique Mari, Lynn Martin, Laura Matricardi, Noura Mebirouk, Veronica Medici, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Alfons Meindl, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Clare Miller, Denise Molina Gomes, Marco Montagna, Thea M. Mooij, Lidia Moserle, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme, Anna Marie Mulligan, Katherine L. Nathanson, Marie Navratilova, Heli Nevanlinna, Dieter Niederacher, Finn C. Cilius Nielsen, Liene Nikitina-Zake, Kenneth Offit, Edith Olah, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Kai-Ren Ong, Ana Osorio, Claus-Eric Ott, Domenico Palli, Sue K. Park, Michael T. Parsons, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Bernard Peissel, Ana Peixoto, Pedro Pérez-Segura, Paolo Peterlongo, Annabeth Høgh Petersen, Mary E. Porteous, Miguel Angel Pujana, Paolo Radice, Juliane Ramser, Johanna Rantala, Muhammad U. Rashid, Kerstin Rhiem, Piera Rizzolo, Mark E. Robson, Matti A. Rookus, Caroline Maria Rossing, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Catarina Santos, Claire Saule, Rosa Scarpitta, Rita K. Schmutzler, Hélène Schuster, Leigha Senter, Caroline M. Seynaeve, Payal D. Shah, Priyanka Sharma, Vivian Y. Shin, Valentina Silvestri, Jacques Simard, Christian F. Singer, Anne-Bine Skytte, Katie Snape, Angela R. Solano, Penny Soucy, Melissa C. Southey, Amanda B. Spurdle, Linda Steele, Doris Steinemann, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Agostina Stradella, Lone Sunde, Christian Sutter, Yen Y. Tan, Manuel R. Teixeira, Soo Hwang Teo, Mads Thomassen, Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Marc Tischkowitz, Silvia Tognazzo, Amanda E. Toland, Stefania Tommasi, Diana Torres, Angela Toss, Alison H. Trainer, Nadine Tung, Christi J. van Asperen, Frederieke H. van der Baan, Lizet E. van der Kolk, Rob B. van der Luijt, Liselotte P. van Hest, Liliana Varesco, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Alessandra Viel, Jeroen Vierstraete, Roberta Villa, Anna von Wachenfeldt, Philipp Wagner, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Greet Wieme, Siddhartha Yadav, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Sook-Yee Yoon, Cristina Zanzottera, Kristin K. Zorn, Anthony V. D’Amico, Matthew L. Freedman, Mark M. Pomerantz, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis C. Antoniou, Susan L. Neuhausen, Laura Ottini, Henriette Roed Nielsen, Timothy R. Rebbeck

Date Published: 13th Nov 2019

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

The multifactorial likelihood analysis method has demonstrated utility for quantitative assessment of variant pathogenicity for multiple cancer syndrome genes. Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co-segregation, family cancer history profile, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case-control information. Research and clinical data for multifactorial likelihood analysis were collated for 1395 BRCA1/2 predominantly intronic and missense variants, enabling classification based on posterior probability of pathogenicity for 734 variants: 447 variants were classified as (likely) benign, and 94 as (likely) pathogenic; 248 classifications were new or considerably altered relative to ClinVar submissions. Classifications were compared to information not yet included in the likelihood model, and evidence strengths aligned to those recommended for ACMG/AMP classification codes. Altered mRNA splicing or function relative to known non-pathogenic variant controls were moderately to strongly predictive of variant pathogenicity. Variant absence in population datasets provided supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. These findings have direct relevance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant evaluation, and justify the need for gene-specific calibration of evidence types used for variant classification. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Authors: Michael T. Parsons, Emma Tudini, Hongyan Li, Eric Hahnen, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Lidia Feliubadaló, Cora M. Aalfs, Simona Agata, Kristiina Aittomäki, Elisa Alducci, María Concepción Alonso-Cerezo, Norbert Arnold, Bernd Auber, Rachel Austin, Jacopo Azzollini, Judith Balmaña, Elena Barbieri, Claus R. Bartram, Ana Blanco, Britta Blümcke, Sandra Bonache, Bernardo Bonanni, Åke Borg, Beatrice Bortesi, Joan Brunet, Carla Bruzzone, Karolin Bucksch, Giulia Cagnoli, Trinidad Caldés, Almuth Caliebe, Maria A. Caligo, Mariarosaria Calvello, Gabriele L. Capone, Sandrine M. Caputo, Ileana Carnevali, Estela Carrasco, Virginie Caux-Moncoutier, Pietro Cavalli, Giulia Cini, Edward M. Clarke, Paola Concolino, Elisa J. Cops, Laura Cortesi, Fergus J. Couch, Esther Darder, Miguel de La Hoya, Michael Dean, Irmgard Debatin, Jesús Del Valle, Capucine Delnatte, Nicolas Derive, Orland Diez, Nina Ditsch, Susan M. Domchek, Véronique Dutrannoy, Diana M. Eccles, Hans Ehrencrona, Ute Enders, D. Gareth Evans, Ulrike Faust, Ute Felbor, Irene Feroce, Miriam Fine, Henrique C. R. Galvao, Gaetana Gambino, Andrea Gehrig, Francesca Gensini, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Aldo Germani, Jutta Giesecke, Viviana Gismondi, Carolina Gómez, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Sara González, Elia Grau, Sabine Grill, Eva Gross, Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Marine Guillaud-Bataille, Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez, Thomas Haaf, Karl Hackmann, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Marion Harris, Jan Hauke, Tilman Heinrich, Heide Hellebrand, Karen N. Herold, Ellen Honisch, Judit Horvath, Claude Houdayer, Verena Hübbel, Silvia Iglesias, Angel Izquierdo, Paul A. James, Linda A. M. Janssen, Udo Jeschke, Silke Kaulfuß, Katharina Keupp, Marion Kiechle, Alexandra Kölbl, Sophie Krieger, Torben A. Kruse, Anders Kvist, Fiona Lalloo, Mirjam Larsen, Vanessa L. Lattimore, Charlotte Lautrup, Susanne Ledig, Elena Leinert, Alexandra L. Lewis, Joanna Lim, Markus Loeffler, Adrià López-Fernández, Emanuela Lucci-Cordisco, Nicolai Maass, Siranoush Manoukian, Monica Marabelli, Laura Matricardi, Alfons Meindl, Rodrigo D. Michelli, Setareh Moghadasi, Alejandro Moles-Fernández, Marco Montagna, Gemma Montalban, Alvaro N. Monteiro, Eva Montes, Luigi Mori, Lidia Moserle, Clemens R. Müller, Christoph Mundhenke, Nadia Naldi, Katherine L. Nathanson, Matilde Navarro, Heli Nevanlinna, Cassandra B. Nichols, Dieter Niederacher, Henriette R. Nielsen, Kai-Ren Ong, Nicholas Pachter, Edenir I. Palmero, Laura Papi, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Bernard Peissel, Pedro Pérez-Segura, Katharina Pfeifer, Marta Pineda, Esther Pohl-Rescigno, Nicola K. Poplawski, Berardino Porfirio, Anne S. Quante, Juliane Ramser, Rui M. Reis, Françoise Revillion, Kerstin Rhiem, Barbara Riboli, Julia Ritter, Daniela Rivera, Paula Rofes, Andreas Rump, Monica Salinas, Ana María Sánchez de Abajo, Gunnar Schmidt, Ulrike Schoenwiese, Jochen Seggewiß, Ares Solanes, Doris Steinemann, Mathias Stiller, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Kelly J. Sullivan, Rachel Susman, Christian Sutter, Sean V. Tavtigian, Soo H. Teo, Alex Teulé, Mads Thomassen, Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Silvia Tognazzo, Amanda E. Toland, Eva Tornero, Therese Törngren, Sara Torres-Esquius, Angela Toss, Alison H. Trainer, Christi J. van Asperen, Marion T. van Mackelenbergh, Liliana Varesco, Gardenia Vargas-Parra, Raymonda Varon, Ana Vega, Ángela Velasco, Anne-Sophie Vesper, Alessandra Viel, Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk, Sebastian A. Wagner, Anke Waha, Logan C. Walker, Rhiannon J. Walters, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Bernhard H. F. Weber, Wilko Weichert, Kerstin Wieland, Lisa Wiesmüller, Isabell Witzel, Achim Wöckel, Emma R. Woodward, Silke Zachariae, Valentina Zampiga, Christine Zeder-Göß, Conxi Lázaro, Arcangela de Nicolo, Paolo Radice, Christoph Engel, Rita K. Schmutzler, David E. Goldgar, Amanda B. Spurdle

Date Published: 1st Sep 2019

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND Height and body mass index (BMI) are associated with higher ovarian cancer risk in the general population, but whether such associations exist among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is unknown.. METHODS We applied a Mendelian randomisation approach to examine height/BMI with ovarian cancer risk using the Consortium of Investigators for the Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) data set, comprising 14,676 BRCA1 and 7912 BRCA2 mutation carriers, with 2923 ovarian cancer cases. We created a height genetic score (height-GS) using 586 height-associated variants and a BMI genetic score (BMI-GS) using 93 BMI-associated variants. Associations were assessed using weighted Cox models. RESULTS Observed height was not associated with ovarian cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07 per 10-cm increase in height, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.23). Height-GS showed similar results (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.85-1.23). Higher BMI was significantly associated with increased risk in premenopausal women with HR = 1.25 (95% CI: 1.06-1.48) and HR = 1.59 (95% CI: 1.08-2.33) per 5-kg/m2 increase in observed and genetically determined BMI, respectively. No association was found for postmenopausal women. Interaction between menopausal status and BMI was significant (Pinteraction \textless 0.05). CONCLUSION Our observation of a positive association between BMI and ovarian cancer risk in premenopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is consistent with findings in the general population.

Authors: Frank Qian, Matti A. Rookus, Goska Leslie, Harvey A. Risch, Mark H. Greene, Cora M. Aalfs, Muriel A. Adank, Julian Adlard, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Munaza Ahmed, Kristiina Aittomäki, Irene L. Andrulis, Norbert Arnold, Banu K. Arun, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Jacopo Azzollini, Daniel Barrowdale, Julian Barwell, Javier Benitez, Katarzyna Białkowska, Valérie Bonadona, Julika Borde, Ake Borg, Angela R. Bradbury, Joan Brunet, Saundra S. Buys, Trinidad Caldés, Maria A. Caligo, Ian Campbell, Jonathan Carter, Jocelyne Chiquette, Wendy K. Chung, Kathleen B. M. Claes, J. Margriet Collée, Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame, Fergus J. Couch, Mary B. Daly, Capucine Delnatte, Orland Diez, Susan M. Domchek, Cecilia M. Dorfling, Jacqueline Eason, Douglas F. Easton, Ros Eeles, Christoph Engel, D. Gareth Evans, Laurence Faivre, Lidia Feliubadaló, Lenka Foretova, Eitan Friedman, Debra Frost, Patricia A. Ganz, Judy Garber, Vanesa Garcia-Barberan, Andrea Gehrig, Gord Glendon, Andrew K. Godwin, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Ute Hamann, Jan Hauke, John L. Hopper, Peter J. Hulick, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Claudine Isaacs, Louise Izatt, Anna Jakubowska, Ramunas Janavicius, Esther M. John, Beth Y. Karlan, Carolien M. Kets, Yael Laitman, Conxi Lázaro, Dominique Leroux, Jenny Lester, Fabienne Lesueur, Jennifer T. Loud, Jan Lubiński, Alicja Łukomska, Lesley McGuffog, Noura Mebirouk, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Alfons Meindl, Austin Miller, Marco Montagna, Thea M. Mooij, Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme, Katherine L. Nathanson, Bita Nehoray, Susan L. Neuhausen, Heli Nevanlinna, Finn C. Nielsen, Kenneth Offit, Edith Olah, Kai-Ren Ong, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Laura Ottini, Michael T. Parsons, Paolo Peterlongo, Georg Pfeiler, Nisha Pradhan, Paolo Radice, Susan J. Ramus, Johanna Rantala, Gad Rennert, Mark Robson, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Ritu Salani, Maren T. Scheuner, Rita K. Schmutzler, Payal D. Shah, Lucy E. Side, Jacques Simard, Christian F. Singer, Doris Steinemann, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Yen Yen Tan, Manuel R. Teixeira, Mary Beth Terry, Mads Thomassen, Marc Tischkowitz, Silvia Tognazzo, Amanda E. Toland, Nadine Tung, Christi J. van Asperen, Klaartje van Engelen, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Jeroen Vierstraete, Gabriel Wagner, Lisa Walker, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Antonis C. Antoniou, David E. Goldgar, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Dezheng Huo

Date Published: 1st Jul 2019

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Abstract (Expand)

BACKGROUND The ’German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer’ (GC-HBOC) offers women with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer genetic counseling. The aim of this modeling studyy was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for BRCA 1/2 in women with a high familial risk followed by different preventive interventions (intensified surveillance, risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy, risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, or both mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy) compared to no genetic test. METHODS A Markov model with a lifelong time horizon was developed for a cohort of 35-year-old women with a BRCA 1/2 mutation probability of ≥ 10%. The perspective of the German statutory health insurance (SHI) was adopted. The model included the health states ’well’ (women with increased risk), ’breast cancer without metastases’, ’breast cancer with metastases’, ’ovarian cancer’, ’death’, and two post (non-metastatic) breast or ovarian cancer states. Outcomes were costs, quality of life years gained (QALYs) and life years gained (LYG). Important data used for the model were obtained from 4380 women enrolled in the GC-HBOC. RESULTS Compared with the no test strategy, genetic testing with subsequent surgical and non-surgical treatment options provided to women with deleterious BRCA 1 or 2 mutations resulted in additional costs of \text€7256 and additional QALYs of 0,43 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of \text€17,027 per QALY; cost per LYG: \text€22,318). The results were robust in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION The provision of genetic testing to high-risk women with a BRCA1 and two mutation probability of ≥ 10% based on the individual family cancer history appears to be a cost-effective option for the SHI.

Authors: Dirk Müller, Marion Danner, Rita Schmutzler, Christoph Engel, Kirsten Wassermann, Björn Stollenwerk, Stephanie Stock, Kerstin Rhiem

Date Published: 1st Jul 2019

Publication Type: Journal article

Human Diseases: hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Powered by
(v.1.13.0-master)
Copyright © 2008 - 2021 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig

By continuing to use this site you agree to the use of cookies